Everyone Else Is About To Have A Great Time at SXSW

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


mojo-photo-barbecue.jpgAnd you’re not. Well, I’m not either, so, uh, wanna go get a beer with me, and cry into it? Actually, my impressions of the Austin music festival (kicking off tonight) had been tarnished in the past few years by some unpleasant stories of desperate battles to get into the most hotly-tipped shows, even if you’d paid the $600 walk-up fee for a badge. But an industry friend’s recent description of the festival as “better than Coachella” made me wish I was going again. The festival is sold (mostly by attendees to their bill-paying bosses) as a “proving ground” for new bands, who then emerge with the momentum to conquer America. That sounds nice, and while bands like Arctic Monkeys, Franz Ferdinand and Bloc Party put on great shows in recent years, their stars had been rising long before they set foot in Austin, and it’s not like a poor performance there would have stopped the hype. So, really, SXSW is just a big party, but attended almost exclusively by music geeks, and since the great unwashed has become more and more intrusive at Coachella in recent years, I see the appeal.

Rolling Stone has a good roundup of some of the bands most likely to see overcrowding and mayhem at their Austin performances, and subsequent press overload the next week. From their list, the excellent Peter Bjorn and John and The Gossip seem most likely to get the breathless post-festival “best show ever” reviews. I don’t quite get the crazed adoration of retro trio The Pipettes, and I’m personally a little tired of Girl Talk getting so much attention for his haphazard laptop silliness (when my friends do it so much better). But, those will definitely be hot tickets. To that list of potential SXSW highlights, I’d add Glasgow rockers The Fratellis (from the iTunes commercial), one of the first US shows from Damon Albarn’s new project The Good the Bad and the Queen, and a set from the UK electronic combo Fujiya & Miyagi. But who knows: last year I heard it was an off-the-schedule secret DJ set by the Presets in a barn in the middle of nowhere that was everybody’s highlight. Sigh. Well, if you’re not there but want to to join in the fun from a distance, check out Hypebot’s helpful links on how to pretend you’re there, including the festival’s official online update toolbox and local station KUT (90.5 FM) which you can listen to online. Grab a beer and some barbecue, and it’ll almost feel like the real thing.

[Update, 5:52pm] Well, shut my mouth about Peter Bjorn and John. Via Gawker, it’s a blog dedicated to convincing the world that they’re “not a significant band.” They’re organizing a “Stop Peter Bjorn and John” rally. I still like them, but this is pretty hilarious.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate