MTV Thinks Indie Bands Are Over

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


mojo-cover-blocparty.jpg A weirdly vitriolic and kind of hard-to-read article appeared today on MTVNews.com with the basic point that “indie bands are unsuccessful.” I suppose it shouldn’t be surprising — it’s kind of like George W. Bush saying global warming doesn’t exist. What are you expecting him to say? But it’s still disappointing. The writer, James Montgomery, describes some sort of mythical time — apparently, 2005 — when bands like Arcade Fire, Bloc Party, and Clap Your Hands Say Yeah were “flavors of the month.” Sadly, none of them could keep it up, because, uh, something happened, “and suddenly,” it reads, “none of them seemed to matter much any more.” Wow!

This is my least favorite kind of pseudo-journalism: “I’m going to make a name for myself as a writer by being against everything the cool kids are for.” It’s controversial and attention-grabbing! But unfortunately, the only actual statistic that Montgomery cites completely contradicts his thesis: Arcade Fire’s new album Neon Bible (as I blabbed about endlessly) debuted on the Billboard charts at #2. Seems pretty good to me. The rest of his “facts” are as follows:

–Clap Your Hands’ new album has sold 1/3 what their first one did (even though it’s only been out three months);
–Bloc Party’s latest has “all but disappeared from the cultural zeitgeist” (he even had to “wiki” the title);
–a “hunch” that Arctic Monkeys’ new CD, released this week, won’t have the same “impact” as the first one.

Right. His entire theory is baseless: independent music’s impact and popularity actually continues to expand, with recent, surprising Top 5 debuts from Bright Eyes, The Shins, and Modest Mouse. Even Bloc Party’s A Weekend in the City debuted at #12, and has sold 50,000 copies already. Not bad for a delicate, wistful album about coming to terms with your sexuality. In fact, one could make the point that with the ascendancy of iTunes, independent music has more of a potential audience than ever.

What’s the point of this article? To point out that not every single self-released, import, or independent album outsells the Pussycat Dolls? Or to find some sort of justification for MTV ignoring independent artists, by pretending they have no impact, or that they’re “over”? Well, a bit of Google sleuthing turns up an interview with Mr. Montgomery on AbsolutePunk.com, where he describes his job as covering “emo/Warped Tour/MySpace/whatever you call it punk.” Oh, okay. Well, perhaps covering Panic! At the Disco might be more up his alley.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate