Party Ben Tries Out the New Amazon.com MP3 Store

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Amazon.com MP3s
In our next story, “Monkey learns to type!” But seriously folks, Amazon.com launched its highly-anticipated MP3 store on Tuesday, the first serious competitor with Apple’s dominant iTunes service, and I’m interested in checking it out. I’m a pretty big fan of the whole iTunes experience (although a bit annoyed with the protected files and stuff), and I’m somebody who happily grabs free mp3s, or buys mp3s, and then buys CDs, so I consider myself a skeptical yet open-minded consumer. I began my self-administered experiment this afternoon.

TunngFirst question: what to buy? Okay, I think I heard Amazon’s store is missing some labels, but in order to mimic the typical music fan’s experience, I’m not going to look them up. I’ll just think of something I want to hear. Let’s start with a challenge: there’s a UK band called Tunng, and their electronic/folk album, Good Arrows, is getting some good reviews, and I would enjoy hearing a song, and I am happy to spend a dollar on it. First up, iTunes. Open it up, search “Tunng.” Bing! Up it pops, a list of albums, and there it is. Not available in DRM-free iTunes Plus format, but it’s here. I click on Good Arrows, and the album tracks pop up, including a column of bars representing the songs’ individual comparitive popularities. Why not grab the most popular one, see what the fuss is about? “Bullets,” buy song, password, OK. Download took about 14 seconds. It sounds pretty good, kind of silly, like XTC meets The Beta Band. Amazon, you’re up.

I head over to Amazon.com and search for Tunng, selecting “MP3 Downloads.” 44 songs pop up, not bad, that’s compared to the 69 songs iTunes had. I don’t see the new album, and the listing is by “relevance,” I’m not sure what that means. Aren’t they all basically irrelevant? This is British folktronica we’re talking about here. Anyway, I’d like to sort by album title, so I try to click there, but no, that’s just a column header. Hmm. Maybe in the “Sort By” menu? Nope, that just gives me the typical Amazon.com choices: “Price – Low to High,” etc. Okay, what song did I want again? “Bullets.” I click “See all 44 songs”… Nope, it’s not here. Very close, Amazon, but Round 1 to iTunes.

mojo-cover-feist.jpgWhat next. Something easier? Okay, howabout Feist’s “1, 2, 3, 4,” to make it ironic, since that’s on the iPod commercial. First, back to the iTunes home page. There it is as #4 on their Top 10 songs. Click “buy song,” no need for the password again since it’s so soon, and the download starts right up. Amazon? To get back to the home page, I click “mp3 downloads,” but that takes me to a random list where Apples in Stereo is #1 on a page that says “Showing 1-24 of 2,335,091 songs.” Weird. But, lucky me, there’s Feist at #10 on this list. Only 89 cents, as opposed to iTunes’ 99 cents. I click “Buy mp3” and I get to the “sign in” page like when I want to order a book. Now it’s asking me to “get the Amazon MP3 downloader.” Hmm, okay, to be fair, I suppose I should do that. I download it, then glance back over at iTunes—hold on a minute, something’s gone wrong with iTunes! The little stripeys are still running, and the track hasn’t downloaded! Oh no, malfunction! Error! “Could not purchase 1234. The network connection was reset.” iTunes forfeits this round!!! Okay, back to installing the Amazon downloader. It installs in a few seconds and takes me right to the next page: “Complete Your Song Download.” I have to select my credit card and address, and then, well, it’s done. A message comes up: “You can find your downloads in your iTunes library.” Oh, snap! Take that, Steve Jobs! Is it there? Well, huzzah, there it is, and at 256 kbit/s, twice the bit rate of an iTunes AAC file. Not bad! And it sounds great. This round to Amazon, and they came very close on the first battle.

So, verdict? Well, the interface is a little cheap, and as a music head I really do use iTunes’ sorting functions quite a bit. iTunes is clearly an experience designed by music lovers, and Amazon’s page was designed by a committee of javascript consultants. But, if it’s easy, and I get a 256 kbit/s file, and it’s cheaper, it’s hard to argue with Amazon. It was easier than starting up my file-sharing program and weeding through all the crap, for instance. Some are saying an “MP3 price war” has begun, and they may be right. That can only be a good thing for consumers, forced to pay the same price for a bunch of protected data as we’d pay for a better-sounding CD.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate