Exhibit Sources

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Parents feel the need to constantly praise their kids: “Praise for Intelligence Can Undermine Children’s Motivation and Performance,” Claudia M. Mueller and Carol S. Dweck, Columbia University, 1998.

College undergrads are more narcissitic today than ever before: “Isn’t It Fun to Get the Respect That We’re Going to Deserve?” Jean M. Twenge, San Diego State University and W. Keith Campbell, University of Georgia, 2003.

Kids praised for intelligence demonstrate lower drive to learn: “How Not to Talk to Your Kids: The Inverse Power of Praise,” Po Bronson, New York magazine.

High school seniors’ reading levels are dropping as their GPAs are rising: “The Nation’s Report Card: 12th-Grade Reading and Mathematics 2005,” National Assessment of Educational Progress.

The only thing failing at Harvard is the campaign to curb grade inflation: “Grade Inflation, Democracy, and the Ivy League,” Peter Lawler, Perspectives on Political Science, 2001.

Miss Teen South Carolina’s enlightened remarks on geography: YouTube clip of Lauren Caitlin Upton.

“Redshirting” becomes a problem: “When Should a Kid Start Kindergarten?” Elizabeth Weil, New York Times; Elizabeth Levett Fortier, George Peabody Elementary School.

McSwooney’s: Dave Eggers’ hyperbolic blurbs: “Amazon Glitch Unmasks War of Reviews,” Amy Harmon, New York Times, February 14, 2004. Eggers’ reviews endorse the following books: The Mineral Palace, Heidi Julavits, Putnam, 2000; God Lives in St. Petersburg, Tom Bissell, Pantheon, 2005; Oh the Glory of It All, Sean Wilsey, The Penguin Press, 2005; No One Belongs Here More Than You: Stories, Miranda July, Scribner, 2007; Adverbs: A Novel, Daniel Handler, Ecco, 2006.

The Harvard A-Team: “Grade Inflation, Democracy, and the Ivy League,” Peter Lawler, Perspectives on Political Science, 2001.

Indigo children get knowledge from another dimension: “Are They Here to Save the World?” John Leland, New York Times; Nancy Ann Tappe, Starling Publishers.

West Virginia high schooler sues over grade: “Judge Tosses Lawsuit Over Grade,” Andrew Clevenger, Charleston Gazette, May 9 2007.

CEOs have trouble taking criticism: “It’s Lonely—and Thin-Skinned—at the Top,” Del Jones, USA Today.

Whole Foods CEO John Mackey plugs himself: “Mr. Mackey’s Offense,” Editorial, Wall Street Journal, July 2007.

HealthSouth CEO erects personal monument before his conviction: “Local Zeroes,” James Surowiecki, The New Yorker, March 2005.

Martha Stewart’s heavy charges for “oral mentions”: “Queen of the Product Pitch,” Burt Helm, Business Week, April 2007; Liz Coleman, Martha Stewart Living.

Napoleon Dynamite showcases “positive aspects of Idaho’s youth”: House Concurrent Resolution No. 29, Idaho House of Representatives.

Quote Whore of the Year: Efilmcritic.com.

Sony Pictures offers rebates for flops: Official Court Notice; “Sony Pictures to Pay $1.5 Million to Settle Suit Over Movie Ads,” Alex Veiga, Associated Press, August 3, 2005.

Harriet Miers’ birthday card to Governor Bush: “The Harriet and George Letters,” The Smoking Gun; “Documents Show Supreme Court Nominee’s Close Ties to Bush,” Ralph Blumenthal and Simon Robero, New York Times, October 11, 2005.

Standing ovations for Bush: 2007 State of the Union address.

Standing ovations on Broadway: “The Tyranny of the Standing Ovation,” Jessie McKinley, New York Times, December 21, 2003.

Standing ovations for yourself: Playfair.com.

Bob Nelson is the guru of thank you: “Most-Praised Generation Craves Kudos at the Office,” Jeffrey Zaslow, Wall Street Journal.

Boo ban: “Proposed New Rules for Sports Events Mean That Soon Fans Might Not Be Able to Say…Boo!” Casey McNerthney, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, March 3, 2007; “Life in the Mean Streets,” Joe Queenan, New York Times, March 24, 2007.

No room for hecklers at Beijing ‘O8: Jing ma must end. “Beijing Seeks End to ‘Colorful’ Cheers and Jeers Before Olympics,” Beijing Economic News, April 2, 2004.

Sports Illustrated cover jinx: “That Old Black Magic,” Alexander Wolff, Sports Illustrated, January 21, 2002.

Best boss hex: “Superstar CEOs,” Ulkrike Malmendier and Geoffrey Tate, March 15, 2007; “Cancel that Cover Shoot,” Dana Wechsler Linden, Forbes, January 6, 2005.

Company Nixon Peabody commissions back-patting song: “Nixon Peabody: This is Not a Theme Song,” David Lat, Above the Law.

U.S. businesses’ incentive expenditures: The International Society for Performance Improvement.

The Container Store lavishes praise: “Most-Praised Generation Craves Kudos at the Office,” Jeffrey Zaslow, Wall Street Journal; Olescia Hanson, Public Relations Director, The Container Store.

Scooter Store has a celebrations assistant: “Most-Praised Generation Craves Kudos at the Office,” Jeffrey Zaslow, Wall Street Journal; Mark B. Leita, Director of Public Affairs, The Scooter Store.

Bronson Healthcare Group makes thank you notes necessary: “Most-Praised Generation Craves Kudos at the Office,” Jeffrey Zaslow, The Wall Street Journal; Jason Manshum, Public Relations Director, Bronson Healthcare Group.

Most employess who prefer cash bonuses don’t recieve them: “Bosses Not on the Same Page as Employees Regarding Recognition,” Maritz Research.

Incentive Marketing Association believes cash has no lasting effect: Incentivemarketing.org.

Engraved praise plaque: Baudville.com.

The Compliment Machine: Washington Project for the Arts/Cocoran; “The Art of Gratuitous Praise,” Joshua Zumbrun, Washington Post, July 21, 2007.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate