Has Madonna Finally Lost the Plot?

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


mojo-photo-madonna.jpgLike any self-respecting homophile dance music enthusiast, I’ve always liked Madonna. Er, let me put it more specifically: I’ve always liked her music. While her mining of the underground often seems to slightly misunderstand it (see “Vogue”), she’s one of the few artists who have combined massive success with consistent boundary-pushing. Partly as a result of her continued search for hot new producers, her output has remained compelling, even 25 (!) years after her first album. 2003’s American Life was a bit of a disappointment, but 2005’s Confessions on a Dancefloor brought producer Stuart Price to the foreground for a brilliant distillation of contemporary dance music styles. Anticipation is high for her 11th studio album, Hard Candy, set for release in April; cover art (left) and the first single (“4 Minutes”) are out now. What’s the verdict?

Well, in a word, “meh.” She’s chosen to work with superproducer Timbaland, and “4 Minutes” even features Timbaland house mouseketeer Justin Timberlake. The song is a plodding retread of the same skittery beat we heard in Timbo’s “Give It To Me.” There are almost-intriguing Baile funk-reminiscent horns tooting around, but the problem is there’s no real hook, and instead we get an eye-rolling save-the-world message grafted on:

While I’ve been a near-tireless cheerleader for Timbaland, his production skills aren’t exactly cutting edge at this point, and somehow seemed to fit better with the refreshingly-new-to-dance-pop Nelly Furtado. Madonna working with Timbaland is like, um, Helen Mirren starring in a Steven Spielberg action flick. Nothing against Spielberg, but seriously? And what about that cover art? “Hey, let’s use this out-take from the Sex book and have Jimmy in graphic design just type up the title in Arial Rounded. Done!” Sure, cover art is dead, but even the 9-pixel-wide screen on my cell phone deserves better artwork than that. Granted, Madonna will be 50 in August, so maybe her advancing age is making her insecure. It’s hard to imagine, though; with her secret yoga moves and Kabbalah chants, she’ll probably live to be 150. So what gives?

With Hard Candy also boasting Pharrell Williams on production credits, it’s worth noting that both he and Timbaland are the first black producers Madonna has spent a whole album with since Reggie Lucas and Nile Rogers on her first two albums, respectively. While I’ll reserve judgment until I hear the whole album, I worry that in Madonna’s attempt to broaden her racial and stylistic horizons to include hip-hop, she’s just picked the most popular producers around, instead of someone who could actually balance her pop instincts with progressive sounds. What about, I dunno, Danjahandz, grime producers Wiley or Mizz Beats, breakbeat producer Tayo, dubsteppers Digital Mystikz, or even a dancehall guy like Vybz Kartel? Even Swizz Beatz or Danger Mouse is edgier than Pharrell these days. If Madonna wanted to finally investigate hip-hop, great, but I wish she’d continued her tradition of looking to the underground (or even the mid-ground) for inspiration, instead of the top of the charts. But with “4 Minutes” set to bring Madonna above Elvis’ record for most Top Ten singles, what do I know?

Photo courtesy Warner Bros.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate