Our Presidential Candidates on Talk Shows: Who Does Better?

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Recently, our three major presidential candidates have made high-profile appearances on TV talk shows, with varying results. Does an ability to share easy jokes and gentle ribbing with our nation’s nighttime sleep-inducers and afternoon time-wasters correlate to success in the polls? Let’s take a look at some clips and see who’s best at the gabfests.

First up, Hillary Clinton appeared on The Tonight Show with Jay Leno last night:

Entry Music: Theme from Rocky, not bad
Best attempt at self-mockery: “I was worried I wasn’t going to make it; I was pinned down by sniper fire.” Funny, but almost too funny, and a little creepy: is a Lewinsky joke next?
Worst try at comedy: “Every night someone calls at 3am… [to Jay] you gotta stop calling me.” Hmm, guess her writers are still on strike.
General demeanor: Amiable, with some good applause lines, but a little desperate-seeming. The extended policy speeches can get a little boring. And for God’s sake, have a lozenge!

Next, it’s John McCain on Letterman on Tuesday, trading some wacky comedy one-liners like they’re on a roast or something:

Entry Theme: Is that Spanish? Is Paul having an immigration-themed laugh?
Best attempt at self-mockery: None, really, although letting Dave have the line about how McCain’s got “wiry hair growing out of new places” is something I guess.
Best line: While all the jokes are cute enough, it’s the little details that make McCain a real comedian, like the deadpan “You think that stuff’s pretty funny dontcha,” when he comes out, and a quick impression of Dave’s hands-in-pockets posture.
Worst moment: The too-wide, pleased-with-himself grin after the “mostly kept to himself” joke.
General demeanor: Pretty swell, but a minute-long writer-fed appearance isn’t too tough to pull off.

And finally, it’s Barack Obama on the View last week:

Entry Music: Generic View walk-on theme; can’t we get some Motown or something?
Best attempt at self-mockery: The oldie but goodie, “I’m skinny but I’m tough.”
Cutest moment: Fanning himself after Barbara Walters tells him he’s “sexy.”
Worst moment: His stuttering open to another labored Wright explanation; just write an opening line on your hand or something.
General demeanor: Friendly enough, but despite his charisma, he’s not at his best when answering tough questions.

So, who wins? Clinton matched her tone exactly to Leno’s middle-of-the-road flip-flop-wearing audience, and her alleged sense of humor came across for once. Obama’s charming, but he’s hobbled by the Wright stuff here, and isn’t on his game. McCain’s brief appearance is the most likable, and while it’s probably unfair to judge it against two 20-minute sit-downs, there’s something to be said for knowing your limitations. It’s kind of symbolic: as Hillary and Barack try to out-talk each other, McCain can swing by with a quick chuckle, and everybody goes, “I like that guy.” So while some may argue the continued Democratic battle is good for the party, in TV talk-show-land, it might not be.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate