UK-Style Music Festivals Gaining Traction in the US

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


mojo-photo-festivals.jpg

While Brits themselves may be lying back and dramatically fanning themselves over their embarrassment of festival riches, the US is just starting to get a taste of “festival mania.” The announcement last month of Outside Lands, set for San Francisco’s Golden Gate Park and featuring Radiohead, Beck and Wilco, was just the latest addition to a growing trend of large-scale events. It’s hard to believe that just ten years ago, the American summer music festival sure seemed dead in the water.

It was, of course, Lollapalooza that first attempted to reconfigure the UK festival for the States. Instead of a one-off multi-stage event (that everyone in your tiny country can easily get to), Lollapalooza sent just a few bands on a nationwide tour, and while it wasn’t exactly a bacchanalian weekend off, its diverse lineup was groundbreaking at the time: Siouxsie and Fishbone sharing the stage with Ice-T and Violent Femmes.

By 1994, Lollapalooza started to have some bad luck. Nirvana was scheduled to headline that summer, and, well, that didn’t happen. Festival organizer Perry Farrell sold his interest to the William Morris agency in 1996, and then Metallica headlined, driving away much of the original audience. Yet it was another event that seemed to sour the country’s mood on music festivals: Woodstock ’99. The concert, featuring lowest-common-denominator sports-metal bands like Limp Bizkit and Buckcherry, devolved into a fiery riot, complete with fleeing reporters and alleged rapes. America seemed about to enact a law restricting concerts to 50 people or less.

But only three months later, a new event sprang up in the desert, without the weight of history or the shackles of a tour: Coachella. It featured some hard rock like Rage and Tool, but leavened the lineup with artists like Morrissey and Beck as well as scads of electronica. 25,000 people attended, and its well-organized grass-and-palm-trees venue was a welcome change from the usual mud-filled pits (despite the searing heat). Reportedly, this first installment didn’t turn a profit, scuttling plans for an event in the fall of 2000. But since getting back on track as an annual spring event in ’01, Coachella has become more and more successful, proving not only that American festivals can make money, but that American kids can be trusted to watch their favorite bands without destroying the place.

Now it’s a veritable, ah, festival of festivals. Both Tennessee’s Bonnaroo and Washington’s Sasquatch started in 2002 with slightly more stinky-hippie vibes, but have since expanded; Bonnaroo sold 80,000 tickets last year. Lollapalooza settled down in Chicago in 2005, to great success (and a multi-year contract). Coachella producers Goldenvoice have expanded to the East Coast with the three-day All Points West, set for August in New Jersey. Even Pitchfork throws an alternative-to-the-alternative 3-day event. Sure, some may complain about short sets (and expensive snacks), but an emerging festival circuit seems like a great way for up-and-coming artists to access open-minded audiences without the risk of a solo tour, and as the record industry scales back (to put it mildly), this can only be a good thing. We may still be a far cry from the UK’s smorgasbord of events, but we’re slowly catching up, and I for one couldn’t be happier… although you’ll never catch me camping.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate