Mr. Match.com Pimps Solar

Gary Kremen wants to hook Americans up with solar energy, one roof at a time.

Photo: Eric Millette

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Gary Kremen sat in his San Francisco office on a winter afternoon, shouting on his cell phone and taking frequent, inexplicable swigs from a bottle of lemon juice. Kremen is 44 and stout, with a raspy voice and an inability to sit still. He founded Match.com in 1993 and ran the porn-marketing site Sex.com before selling it off for a reported $14 million in 2006. Lately, he has been sinking a chunk of his wealth and most of his energy into a new, slightly more altruistic startup called Clean Power Finance.

The new company, says Kremen, “is all about bringing solar to mass market”—making the case for going solar to average Americans, rather than just selling its virtues to what he calls “green liberals,” “national-security types,” and “utility haters.” He wants to make installing solar panels on your roof as mundane as buying a car or any other big-ticket item. “If we’re really going to get solar working, it can’t be a green sell. It’s got to be an economic sell,” he says. “I’m all about ‘green is cool.’ But that’s not big enough.”

His plan has two parts. First, he offers user-friendly sales software and marketing support to solar-panel installers. “Installers are guys with trucks. They’re guys with ladders,” Kremen explains. “They’re not sophisticated marketers.” The software helps installers calculate their customers’ tax credits and energy-bill savings and boil the data down for a slick sales pitch. Then, once the installer gets close to making the sale, Clean Power Finance steps in to broker a market-rate loan for the buyer, making the $20,000 to $50,000 cost of a solar setup manageable.

With the U.S. market for solar power expected to be worth $69 billion by 2016, the potential payoff is huge. The field is being populated by former dot-com barons like Kremen, and many have lured their stable of venture capitalists in with them. “These are serial entrepreneurs,” says Adam Browning of the Vote Solar Initiative, a California nonprofit, “and they see energy as the next field to conquer.” PayPal cofounder Elon Musk is now chairman of a solar-installation firm. Google, which powers its headquarters partly with a titanic solar installation, recently invested $10 million in a solar-thermal startup. Browning says dot-commers’ enthusiasm for solar “appeals to their desire to do good. They want to be part of something bigger.”

Several of Clean Power Finance’s 10 employees, working for significantly less pay than they’d command at a tech company, fit this profile. Kremen, for his part, doesn’t fit any profile exactly. Four years ago he was living alone in a mansion outside San Diego—a palace awarded to him in a lengthy lawsuit against a con man who’d stolen his Sex.com domain name. (Kremen also won $65 million.) It was a lonely time, with Kremen forgoing the online dating scene he’d helped create and offering $25,000 to anyone who successfully set him up with a Jewish bride. The San Diego Jewish Journal likened him to George Costanza: “loveable…like an irritable teddy bear.”

Bright Idea

Solar-powered malls
Energywise, shopping malls are the Hummers of the retail world. So why not cover those acres of empty roofs and parking spaces with PV panels? Enter Destiny USA, a 1.3-million-square-foot renewable-energy-powered addition to a mall in Syracuse, New York. A solar array covering the parking lot will provide about 12 percent of the power, and the builders say on-site wind, fuel cells, biofuel, and hydroelectric will provide the rest. The project is not purely altruistic: The developer’s solar shopping spree is backed by local and state tax breaks and federal green-building bonds.
Joyce Tang

Click here to see more Bright Ideas.

Thanks to the bounty, Kremen got married earlier this year. He concedes that launching Clean Power Finance “feels better” than “doing some other horrible dot-com or another porn company.” But he still seems to be in it primarily for the money. “We’re hitting this tipping point of getting off of fossil fuels and onto sustainable energy sources,” he told me, “and money’s made at tipping points.” Just as the Web changed how people communicate—the tipping point Kremen exploited with Match.com—he anticipates that solar will break down our system of centralized energy production and create a distributed network of tiny power-producing homesteads. I mentioned that Al Gore had recently forecast something similar, a so-called “Electranet.” “Whatever, Al Gore,” Kremen answered impatiently.

Browning commends Kremen’s car-salesmanlike approach. He notes that no cars would ever get sold if dealers had to tell every customer, “Nice that you want to buy this car, but since you didn’t bring $30,000 with you, why don’t you go away, talk to somebody about getting that money, and come back when you’ve got it.” Instead, there’s gmac financing right there on the lot. That kind of full-service sales package, Browning says, is central to “growing the market for solar from an infant to a teenager.”

However, at the time of my visit to Kremen’s office in January, not quite six months after he’d started offering loans, Clean Power Finance had closed only one. “It would be better if this mortgage and credit crisis didn’t suck,” he griped. He doesn’t expect to turn a profit for at least another year. Part of the problem is that most solar customers already have the means to pay up front; as one of Kremen’s colleagues put it, many installers are still operating profitably as “order takers” and don’t yet feel pressure to become salespeople. And even if they do, right now the economic case for home solar can really only be made in the handful of states such as California, New York, and New Jersey that are offering significant tax rebates or other incentives. Kremen said it’s better to be ahead of the curve than behind it. But, he admitted, “I’m hoping it’s too early, as opposed to it’s never.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate