Music: Great One-Note Guitar Solos

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


mojo-photo-note.jpgSure, everybody loves a guitar show-off, melting picks and blistering fingers as they break barriers of time and space to send billion-note hyperspeed solos out into the cosmos like a rock Big Bang. But for those of us who came of musical age under the fuzzy blanket of shoegaze, the anti-rockist banners of punk, or the tripped-out tie-dye of psychedelia, Yngwie Malmsteen-style pyrotechnics not only seem excessive, they also kind of hurt our ears. So, let’s take time to celebrate guitarists at the other end of the spectrum, musicians who have found that a single note, played at just the right moment, can stand up to the most complicated finger gymnastics. Now, sure, you may ask, “if it’s just one note, how can you tell if it’s a solo and not just, well, a note?” There were two basic criteria: one, the position of the solo at a climactic moment in the song, generally just after the second chorus (disqualifying “You Keep Me Hangin’ On”); and two, when the solo is finished, you feel like standing up and cheering, or at least you would if you weren’t so cool.

U2 – “Love is Blindness” (solo at 2:17)
Okay, maybe this one doesn’t quite satisfy the second rule, but since this devastatingly bleak number from Achtung Baby is about as far from a “picker-upper” as you could get, I’ll let it slide. While The Edge has been known for his straightforward guitar work, this may be his most minimal statement: a single scraping tone, played exactly twice.

The Who – “I Can See For Miles” (solo at 2:21)
Psychedelic freak-out jams, you rule. You’ve got enough kooky chords and nutty vocal harmonies going on that the craziest thing that a guitarist could do would be to just play one note over and over really really fast.


The Pixies – “Bone Machine”
(solo at 2:37)
This also is a bit of a stretch: Joey Santiago is playing a weird chord here, not just one note, but considering it’s the same chord for at least four or five measures, I think it qualifies. In this live version he seems to go a little wild, adding one or possibly two notes to the solo, but still, you get the idea.

Ramones – “I Wanna Be Sedated” (solo at 0:54)
Funny, if you “can’t control your fingers,” you’d think you would play more than one note, although maybe you’re just gearing up for the key change. Either way, this is about as pure of a single tone as you can get out of a guitar.


Neil Young – “Cinnamon Girl”
(solo at 2:54)
The acknowledged king of the one-note solo, “Cinnamon Girl” somehow managed to enter the Great Solo Canon (landing at #20 on a Rolling Stone list of “coolest” solos) while also being a complete nose-thumb to the very idea of a guitar solo. But what a spectacular moment in a great song: “your baby loves to dance,” Young sings, and then the single guitar note propels you into ecstasy without overwhelming the driving rhythm—how could anyone help but dance?

Okay, guitar nerds: any one-note solos I missed? I spent some time sifting through my collections of Dandy Warhols and Oasis records but it seems like they always manged to throw in a second or third note. On the other hand, maybe there are brilliantly complicated solos that don’t burst your eardrums. Weigh in, Riffers, if you’re out there.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate