Meeting in the Ladies’ Room

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Man, I wish I’d thought to write this piece. Kudos to the Wall Street Journal for taking the ladies’ loo seriously.

I have long been amazed at the camaraderie of the average women’s bathroom, even in anonymous settings like restaurants and malls. A wedding or party? Forget about it. There’s a reason we all pack up and go to pee together, gents: We’re having fun and laughing at y’all.

It’s nothing for a woman at the next sink, or even from a stall, to sing out with her own opinion when I’m chatting with a friend or just grousing about how my skirt won’t hang right. We give each other advice and tampons. We share lotion and lie about how our sink mates are not wearing too much eyeliner. I have yet to have a woman refuse to spare a square. Most of all, we compliment each other’s outfits and talk shopping: “Fierce shoes!” “75 percent off.” “No way! Where?”

It’s fun, though it’s no fun at all when the rest room is packed and there’s a line; I never hate women so much as when waiting to get back to my seat after intermission. Let’s just say this: Women take too freaking long peeing! I come out re-dressing when there’s a line, so as to minimize others’ wait. Other women routinely look at me, shocked, as if the damn thing was co-ed and they’d never seen another women tucking in her shirt. Oooooh, and the goddamn peeing on the seats! Even worse—not flushing, as if one’s own effluvia is more offensive to them than to us.

I make a point to shame any woman I catch doing it. My favorite tack is this: “Your highness! Majesty? You forgot your royal pee.” Or, “Oh, are your servants coming to flush for you, Princess?” I’ve also played the journalist card, whipping out the notebook I take everywhere and attempting to ‘interview’ them for the psychological study I pretend to be doing. Twenty years in, no one has ever done anything other than run. Sweet. Traveling in Europe once with local friends, the women finally got around to asking me why I approached each toilet stall as if it might contain a bomb, gingerly peeping around stall doors. When I explained, they were speechless.

But I digress.

Given my own non-traditional career path, I’d not given much thought to the professional advantages to be had when one slips out from a staff meeting for a potty break and ends up with the inside scoop on imminent firings, corporate strategy, and the like. According to the WSJ though, strategic bathroom use can often make important differences in women’s lives:

…for me, ladies’ room banter is an endless source of wisdom and comfort. My ladies’ room crowd includes a fashion maven, a globetrotter who knows every good cheap restaurant in Paris, Berkeley and Hong Kong, a marriage counselor, several cancer survivors and a bevy of super-moms. They’ve guided me about how to survive pre-school interviews and college tours and which internist to choose in my health care plan. They’ve advised me about where to get the best cocktail dress, haircut and beach house that won’t break my budget. The time I’ve saved shopping, searching for doctors and worrying about my daughter because of advice gleaned in my office ladies’ room has added up to months of work for my company and saved me from numerous multitask meltdowns.

…Some women who report to other women confess they have an advantage. When they are standing side by side with their bosses at lavatory sinks, they sometimes hold impromptu meetings—and get quick answers to problems.

One colleague on her first day back to work from a maternity leave retreated to the ladies’ room to shed some tears, not because she was sorry her leave had ended but because she didn’t like her job. Suddenly a former boss and mentor emerged from a toilet stall and asked “what’s wrong?” An hour later, the mentor appeared at my colleague’s desk to tell her she’d soon have a new assignment.

So, fellas, the next time your cubicle mate spends a half hour in the ladies’ room and comes back smiling, you might want to worry about your job. It’s not the men-only lounge at a fancy country club where all the wheeling and dealing is done, but it’ll have to do.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate