Top Five: Obscure Cure

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


mojo-photo-curestuff.jpg

Want to feel old? Chew on this: the Cure got their first record deal 30 years ago this September. Where’s my walker? Fortunately, band leader Robert Smith isn’t showing his age, and in anticipation of the band’s forthcoming (as yet untitled) 13th album, they’re releasing a single every month this summer. The latest installment, “Sleep When I’m Dead” (below) is a rerecording of a rejected track from the 1985 Head on the Door sessions, and it has that era’s quirky, jaunty feel, like a darker “Let’s Go to Bed.”

Back in the day, it seemed like the Cure could do no wrong: even B-sides and obscure album tracks were amazing. After the jump: five great Cure songs that never made it to the hit parade.

1. “The Upstairs Room” (from The Walk EP, 1983)
A hypnotic balance of robotic synth-pop and aggressive, angular guitar work, “Upstairs Room” also features Robert Smith at his most sassy: after declaring he couldn’t love “anyone but you” he adds a biting “dear,” and then, just to make it clear, deadpans “that’s for sure.”

2. “M” (from Seventeen Seconds, 1980)
Even though this song has the bare-bones production typical of the era, its swooshing cymbal and extended coda offer tantalizing hints at the band’s future. Plus, what better mantra for the ’80s club scene is there but “you’ll fall in love with somebody else again tonight”?

3. “Like Cockatoos”
(from Kiss Me Kiss Me Kiss Me, 1987)
Another track that sounds better in retrospect, “Cockatoos” is easily overlooked on the sprawling, 17-track Kiss Me, but its swirling production and Eastern tones point directly towards the 1989 masterpiece Disintegration.

4. “Plastic Passion” (from “Boys Don’t Cry” single, 1979)
While the lyrics don’t really make any sense (are they talking about credit cards?) the track’s propulsive, new-wave energy make it a worthy B-side to “Boys Don’t Cry,” and there’s almost a taste of “Close to Me” in its double-time beat.

5. “Sinking” (from Head on the Door, 1985)
Sure, Head on the Door isn’t exactly obscure, but “Sinking” is almost lost amongst the towering hits like “Inbetween Days” and “Close to Me.” It may be the 8th best song on the album (just ahead of “Screw” and “The Baby Screams,” in my humble opinion), but it presages the epic turn the band would soon take.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate