Last.fm Leads to Uncomfortable Musical Self-Awareness

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


mojo-photo-lastlogo.jpgSome readers out there in Rifftopia might consider your ridiculously-named contributor to be an ahead-of-the-curve proponent of bleeding-edge technology. But nothing could be further from the truth. To be honest, I’m like a curmudgeonly grandpa, grudgingly forcing myself to take up new software and gadgets only after their obvious usefulness has finally seeped through my thick skull, and even then it’s a real effort. Crimeny, I didn’t have a MySpace page until 10 months ago, and I was the last one of my Nebraska family to even get a cell phone. Pathetically lazy or just wary, I’m no “early adopter.”

So after much hesitation, I finally signed up on Last.fm, the web site that tallies users’ listening habits in the same way SoundScan adds up CD sales. You download a little widget, then anything you listen to in iTunes, for instance, pops up on your profile page. Your “spins” are also added into Last.fm’s system-wide charts. It’s kind of like a do-it-yourself Nielsen ratings system for music.

At first, it was exciting. Last.fm sorted (or as they put it, “scrobbled”) through my recent iTunes listening history and made a neat little chart. Unsurprisingly, my most listened to artist turned out to be Radiohead, who also occupied the top spot on the site-wide artist chart until Coldplay knocked them down to #2 last month. It’s easy to see why: Radiohead’s target demographic of computer-savvy geeks are more likely to download a Last.fm widget, and more importantly, In Rainbows was only available as mp3s for months, meaning most listens happen on the computer. Way to work the system, Radiohead.

But now, the site is starting to give me the creeps. Last.fm home pages show a running tally of what you’ve listened to and when, and while I have no evidence anyone’s actually looking at mine, it’s affecting my listening habits. If I’ve got a hip new album by Quiet Village or Santogold playing, and I have to run to the store across the street, I catch myself thinking, “I’ll just let it play and up my spin count.” Conversely, checking out the new Coldplay album to review it for the Riff plopped that band right into my Top 15. Yeech! The shame, it burns!

Now I’m even more careful when I click “play.” My dad has me on the lookout for new music he might like, so yesterday I downloaded the new Oren Lavie to burn a CD for him. Then I thought, why not give it a listen myself? I was kind of enjoying it, even though it’s profoundly sappy and super wimpy and tear-jerky. Then I suddenly remembered: everyone can see me listening to this stuff! Pause, pause, pause!

Welcome to the Observer Effect, the well-known psychological phenomenon where one changes one’s behavior due to the awareness of being observed, otherwise known as “reactivity.” When the phenomenon pops up in an experiment, it might skew the results, but with Last.fm, it’s screwing with my life, the soundtrack to my blogging, laundry folding, cocktail drinking. Remember the good old days, when I’d just listen to whatever I felt like? On the other hand, seeing my musical habits all tallied up has reminded me to put albums on that I’d been meaning to spend more time with, so maybe a little self-awareness isn’t such a bad thing. Thankfully, I still have secrets: Last.fm can’t see what goes on my record player. Hooray, I have Hall ‘n’ Oates on vinyl!

So, Riffers, where do you draw the line with revealing yourself to the world wide web, and how has it affected your behavior?

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate