Joan Baez: Two 20-Somethings on a 60s Icon

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


joan-baez-250x200.jpgIn 1959 Joan Baez was a pint-sized college dropout with a hell of a lot of hair playing her folk tunes in pretty much any Boston club that would have her. Once the sixties came—well, we know the rest—Baez met Bob Dylan, and she quickly became the darling of the nascent protest folk-rock scene. Her soprano reworkings of classic spirituals and folk songs became the soundtrack by which a generation remembers their youth.

Today, the 67 year-old Baez refuses to become a relic. To celebrate the 50th anniversary of her recording career, Baez has released The Day After Tomorrow, a new album of covers drawn from sources such as Elvis Costello and Thea Gilmore. (In true Baez style, the title track is a cover of Tom Waits’ classic wartime ode to a disheartened soldier.)

Two of us MoJo staffers caught Baez during the last leg of her recent national tour. Later, we discussed via gchat how the rebel-rousing folksinger translates from legend to the stage. Full disclosure: Neither of us was even in utero during the sixties.

Jesse: Well, first off, I really enjoyed the show. It was my first time seeing Joan Baez, and I left feeling warm and cuddly, ready to give a stranger a hug.

Alexis: I mean she’s Joan freaking BAEZ.

Jesse: Word. I’ve been hearing about her my whole life. My mother was jealous.

Alexis: So was mine. She offered to fly out to come to the show.

Jesse: My mom didn’t tell me Joan was so religious, or maybe spiritual is a better word.

Alexis: Is she?

Jesse: Well, I can’t be sure, but she kept talking about Jesus and God, and then Gandhi.

Alexis: But I think a lot of that is sort of sixties spiritual jargon, that when coming out of the mouth of a 60-year-old women is completely different than a 17-year-old hippie.

Jesse: Yeah, now it just sounds new-agey.

Alexis: You still have to respect her for coming out with new stuff though.

Jesse: Right. And her voice is still remarkably sweet.

Alexis: It sounds exactly the same. It’s crazy.

Jesse: But, let’s be honest, she’s not a virtuoso. I really think people came more for the culture, to reconnect with a meaningful time in their own lives. I mean, she kept offering little nuggets of insight into her world. She introduced her mom, after all.

Alexis: Bob Dylan, Johnny Cash… She can name drop.

Alexis: There was a women sitting next to us just beaming, singing along with every lyric. It’s clear that seeing her is really about so much more than the music. It’s almost like a baby-boomer reunion. There was this collective energy about age. Like the way she kept joking about the time lapse and changing her song lyrics to reflect that it was 40 years in the future. Those jokes got the most laughs. But hearing the same songs sung in a concert hall to adults who might as well be attending a Barry Manilow concert is just incredibly sad. The baby boomers grew up, the revolution never happened, and now Joan Baez sings covers for $50 a pop. And you can buy a Pellegrino in the lobby after you’ve signed your Amnesty International petition.

Jesse: I’ve just got to say that she’s done a much better job of practicing what she’s been preaching and publicizing her beliefs and taking a strong stand for justice than Bob Dylan.

Alexis: She was one of the first celebrities to come out for Obama actively, and she’s still a regular face in the protest scene. Its funny, considering the Joan Didion piece on her where she’s called “the Madonna of the disaffected” and “the pawn of the protest movement.” I mean she still has those qualities, but it’s definitely something she owns and controls and seeks. She’s not 17 anymore.

Jesse: I don’t know if I’d call her a pawn necessarily, but I bet that’s where I’ll get to see her next, at a protest rally. Would you see her again, I mean, outside of a protest rally?

Alexis: I think I would, but only if I brought my mom.

—Alexis Fitts and Jesse Finfrock.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate