McCaffrey Says US in The “End Game” in Iraq

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


mccaffrey_no.jpeg.jpg

Barry McCaffrey, a retired Army general who now teaches international relations at West Point, has made frequent fact-finding trips to Iraq in the years since the 2003 invasion. A decorated Vietnam veteran, leader of an Army division during the Gulf War, and a former top general of the US Southern Command, McCaffrey’s experience has made him a respected voice in military circles, and a guy whose views on the Iraq War are not easily ignored.

Just back from his most recent trip to Iraq, McCaffrey—who in March 2007 characterized the US mission there as being in “strategic peril”—says in an “after action report” (.pdf) to his colleagues at West Point that the US military is “now clearly in the end game in Iraq to successfully achieve what should be our principle objectives.” Among these, he includes withdrawing US troops within 36 months and leaving behind an Iraq that has a functioning civil state and security force that is not engaged in war, either with itself or any of the country’s six neighboring states.

“The bottom line,” McCaffrey writes, “is a dramatic and growing momentum for economic and security stability which is unlikely to be reversible. I would not characterize the situation as fragile. It is just beyond the tipping point.” A sampling of recent successes, as McCaffrey describes them:

  • It is unarguable that the past 18 months have witnessed a dramatic, positive change in the Iraqi security situation.
  • The lawless disintegration of the state at province and municipal level which was apparent on my earlier visits has now largely abated…
  • Iranian intervention is relentless, lethal, and implacably hostile to US interests—but has to a great extent alienated the southern Iraqi Shia and been largely ineffective.
  • Turkey and the semi-independent Kurdish north (KRG) have developed enormously important and profitable mutual economic ties. [Note: This warming relationship is described in greater detail in a new report (.pdf) from the International Crisis Group, released today.]
  • Mr. Maliki clearly has matured and gained stature as a political leader since he assumed his very dangerous and complex leadership responsibilities.
  • The Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of the Interior now have moderate, comparatively apolitical, and increasingly competent senior leadership…
  • The Sons of Iraq Movement has absorbed more than 100,000 Sunni insurgent fighters and brought them into a neighborhood watch program which has successfully confronted the remnants of the insurgency.
  • All that said, McCaffrey notes that the war is not won (however that may be defined) and risks remain that things could go south. For example, if a “Status of Forces” agreement is not reached before the current UN mandate for US troops in Iraq expires at the end of December, American units will have to return to their bases and begin withdrawal, threatening Iraq’s recent gains. Politicians in Baghdad have so far not agreed to US proposals, which McCaffrey says is like “holding a gun to their own head.” Beyond that, Iran’s covert operations in Iraq continue to be destabilizing, and if Tehran goes forward with nuclear weapons development, the inevitable US response could wreak havoc on the entire region, Iraq included. Then there’s the question of Kirkuk and control of nearby oil fields. A Kurdish-Arab war over this strategic prize could still be in the cards unless an oil-sharing agreement can be struck.

    McCaffrey concludes that the incoming Obama administration “will have to think through their military options in the coming six months,” but that “the likely strategic outcome will be a more rapid forced drawdown than desirable in Iraq in order to enhance combat power in Afghanistan. It will be a tricky balance—but in my judgment we will pull this off successfully… As the Saudis note with great sadness—we entered Iraq uninvited… but we must not leave the same way. It is essential for both the US and Mid East security that we pull out of Iraq in a deliberate and responsible manner—and leave a stable and functioning state. This is clearly within our capabilities.”

    WE'LL BE BLUNT

    It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

    The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

    Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

    The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

    Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

    And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

    Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

    If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

    payment methods

    WE'LL BE BLUNT

    It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

    The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

    Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

    The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

    Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

    And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

    Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

    If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

    payment methods

    We Recommend

    Latest

    Sign up for our free newsletter

    Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

    Get our award-winning magazine

    Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

    Subscribe

    Support our journalism

    Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

    Donate