Obama Splits From Bush, Slams Wall Street

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Wall Street is slowly learning that it’s a new era in Washington.

In the wake of a report showing $18.4 billion in bonuses will be paid to Wall Street employees this year, President Obama slammed the behavior of the financial industry as the “height of irresponsibility” on Thursday. The $18.4 billion figure is down by almost half from last year, but still represents the sixth-highest bonus total on record. The bonuses were granted despite the fact that Obama just went to Congress to beg for the second $350 billion installation in TARP funding that will be used to bail out Wall Street.

In a move the previous administration never would have dreamed of, the President lit into Wall Street when asked for comment:

“Part of what we are going to need is for the folks on Wall Street who are asking for help is to show some restraint and to show discipline and to show some financial responsibility,” he said.

“The American people understand that we’ve got a big hole that we’ve got to dig ourselves out of but they don’t like the idea that people are digging a bigger hole even as they are beginning to fill it up.”

“So we are going to be having conversations directly with these folks on Wall Street, underscoring that they have to start acting in a more responsible manner.”

Obama added that “now is not that time” for bonuses and that Wall Street “should know better.” Considering that bonuses are technically rewards for positive performance, it seems obvious that “now is not the time.” In a apocalyptic year for the financial industry in which banks failed left and right, who on Wall Street deserves a pat on the back?

Obama’s decision to come down hard on Wall Street is a departure from the previous president. Asked for an opinion on the $440,000 coastal retreat AIG execs threw for themselves just days after getting approved for bailout funds, Bush spokeswoman Dana Perino called it “pretty despicable.” But Bush himself said nothing. And while the then-president did address Wall Street bonuses weakly in January 2007 — saying, “You need to pay attention to the executive compensation packages that you approve. You need to show the world that America’s businesses are a model of transparency and good corporate governance.” — he never lashed out like Obama did this week. Indeed, it would have been difficult — his treasury secretary, Hank Paulson, was paid a whopping $38 million as the head of Goldman Sachs the year before he transitioned to Bush’s cabinet.

The less Wall Street-friendly regime is pairing its rhetoric with action. President Obama announced a Middle Class Task Force on Friday, which will be headed by Vice President Joe Biden and will have the following goals, according to the White House:

Expanding education and lifelong training opportunities
Improving work and family balance
Restoring labor standards, including workplace safety
Helping to protect middle-class and working-family incomes
Protecting retirement security

The task force will have a ton of firepower. Its members include the Secretaries of Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Commerce, as well as the Directors of the National Economic Council, the Office of Management and Budget, the Domestic Policy Council, and the Chair of the Council of Economic Advisors. The President announced it by saying, “The recession is deepening and the urgency of our economic crisis is growing. Yesterday we reached a new threshold: the highest number of Americans receiving unemployment benefits on record. Every day it seems there’s another round of layoffs, another round of jobs lost and families’ lives turned upside down.” He then turned the microphone over to the Vice President, who said, “To this, the great American middle class, you have simply said, we’re on your side again.” And suggesting where the task force’s sympathies will lie, he said, “It’s good to see so many of my friends from… organized labor, as well. Welcome back to the White House.”

Labor gets a warm embrace while Wall Street gets the lash. Change has come to Washington.

Update: Chris Bowers is not so pleased with Obama. He suggests Obama could have stopped these bonuses before they happened.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate