Copyright Smackdown: AP Goes After Shepard Fairey

Image created with a little help from <a href="http://obamiconme.pastemagazine.com/">Obamicon.me</a>. Copyright symbol from <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e1/Copyright-serif.svg/354px-Copyright-serif.svg.png">Wikimedia</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Via the Associated Press, we learn that the Associated Press is coming after Shepard Fairey for using one of its photos as the basis of his (everyone say it with me!) iconic Obama “Hope” poster. A few weeks ago, a diligent photographer finally ID’d the poster’s source image as a shot taken in 2006 by an AP freelancer. The AP is now crying copyright infringement and says it has “reached out to Mr. Fairey’s attorney.” (It’s worth noting that when Reuters briefly thought the shot was theirs, they simply asked for credit.) So was Fairey’s unattributed appropriation of the image fair
use? That depends in part on whether the Hope poster was derivative or
transformative (and not just in the political sense). On the derivative
side, even though Fairey’s a design whiz, what he did to the AP image
was not all that tricky. (Photoshop/Illustrator geeks can get the
lowdown here.)
On the transformative side, he altered the original enough that it took
a year to figure out where it came from (though Fairey might have
bothered to note his source in the first place).

Also, Fairey claims he didn’t make any money off the posters, which
were sold to raise money for Obama. And it doesn’t hurt that Fairey’s
lawyer is Anthony Falzone, the head of Stanford’s Fair Use Project and
a colleague of free-culture guru Lawrence Lessig. It looks like the AP is hoping against hope. Maybe it will settle for an autographed poster, now going for as much as $12K on Ebay.

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate