Romney Treated Like a Savior at CPAC. Is He?

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Twelve months ago, Mitt Romney made a hero’s entrance but a loser’s exit here at CPAC. Trailing in the Republican Primary, but recently accepted as the far right’s representative in the field, Romney entered the room to thunderous applause but used his speech to make a surprise withdrawal from the race, drawing gasps and cries of despair from the crowd. (For a full report from that day, including quotes from crushed Mitt followers, click here.) From that point forward, you’ll remember, Romney became a political odd man out. He had to grovel before John McCain would allow him to be his surrogate on television.

Today, in the same ballroom in the same hotel, Romney made another hero’s entrance. The CPAC attendees — burned by a presidential nominee who did not share their far-right beliefs and disappointed in a Republican congressional leadership they see as providing no leadership at all — embraced Romney warmly. Organizers were forced to open a second ballroom for overflow viewing. Romney’s introducer, the head of the American Conservative Union and the official host of CPAC, called Romney “one of the family.” Romney replied, “It feels like coming home, I gotta tell ya.”
Romney’s speech was standard fare. “I’m afraid I know where the liberal Democrats want to take us,” he said. “And as they try to pull us in the direction of government-dominated Europe, we’re going to have to fight as never before to make sure that America stays America.” He called Barack Obama weak on national security, stood strong in opposition to a “big-government takeover of health care,” and hit congressional Democrats for spending excessively. There was little to distinguish Romney from dozens of other speakers at the conference.

But the crowd loved him. It felt a little like a campaign rally. If Romney runs for president in 2012, this will be his base. But there are two problems that will likely trouble the relationship.

First, catering positions and rhetoric to the CPAC crowd might get Romney through a Republican primary, but it simply will not get him elected president. These people cheered the idea of Newt Gingrich running for president on Thursday. They hooted and hollered when Ron Paul said the poor and foreclosed-upon had no right to go “crying and begging and pleading” to the government. This isn’t a political space swing voters or moderate Democrats are ever going to shift to.

Second, there is no way that Romney, if elected, could satisfy CPACers for four or eight years. Elected officials are bound by the realities of politics and the institutions in which they serve. They are forced to compromise, negotiate, and make the best out of bad situations. A President Romney would anger CPAC just like President Bush did. Right-wing Republicans who think they have a savior in Romney should think again – the only way they would be satisfied is if America had a President Limbaugh, assisted by a Congress filled with 100 Senator Limbaughs and 435 Congressmen Limbaughs. For people this extreme, there are no saviors. Just politicians who disappoint the least.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate