The Six Worst Tax Cuts in the Senate’s Stimulus

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


After a week of debate and a round of stumping from President Obama, the Senate passed its version of the economic stimulus package on Tuesday afternoon.

The bill outlines $840 billion in spending and tax relief, and just after the votes were tallied, Citizens for Tax Justice released its list (PDF) of the six worst tax cuts—costing $123 billion more than the House bill—in the Senate’s stimulus:

  • The Alternative Minimum Tax “patch”: Halts the Alternative Minimum Tax for one year, but steers most of the cuts toward the richest 10 percent of taxpayers, who will receive 69 percent of the $70 billion cut and will be the least likely group to spend that money. The AMT began as a way for the government to force the ultra-rich to pay taxes, even if they found enough loopholes in the tax code to pay next to nothing.
  • The Home Ownership Tax Credit: Proposes a non-refundable credit to stimulate the housing market. Any family of four with more than $116,500 in income that purchases a home is eligible for a maximum $15,000 one-year tax break. If the family elects to take the credit over two years, it must show $78,250 in income. But since the tax is not refundable, it only benefits those who make enough money to have a tax liability.
  • Deduction for Automobile Purchases: Anybody who bought a car (maximum sticker price: $49,500) after November 12, 2008, and through the end of this year can deduct the loan interest and excise taxes on the car. That is if you can secure a loan.
  • Halting the Tax on Unemployment Benefits: Workers pay taxes on their unemployment benefits, so it sounds like a good idea, but it ultimately benefits high-income earners who receive unemployment assistance. The Senate provision reduces taxes on the first $2,400 of benefits, but the size of the cut varies based on the recipient’s tax bracket. For example, someone earning $200,000 normally pays a 28 percent income tax. If that person also received unemployment benefits on his or her way to making $200,000, he or she would receive a 28 percent tax cut on the first $2,400 of unemployment benefits. Another worker with $42,000 in total earnings pays a 10 percent income tax. If that worker receives unemployment assistance, he or she only sees a 10 percent tax cut on the first $2,400 in benefits.
  • Five-year Retroactive Tax Cut on Net Operating Losses: Lets companies receive refunds against taxable earnings going back five years, instead of the normal two-year period. The provision doesn’t create incentives for companies to use the refunds to hire new workers or expand their businesses.
  • Cancellation of Indebtedness Income Tax Deferment: The Senate bill offers a tax cut that will allow businesses to defer paying taxes on canceled debt. The IRS sees canceled, or forgiven, debt as income (if you take out a $20,000 loan, and your creditor cancels the debt, the IRS considers you $20,000 richer), and canceling this tax rewards businesses who take on heavy debt loads, one of the symptoms of the recession.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate