CDC Makes Progress (Sort of) on Katrina Children’s Health Study

Will a ProPublica investigation force FEMA and the CDC to finally follow up on the health effects of formaldehyde in evacuee trailers?

Photo courtesy of Bill Starling/ProPublica

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


This story was first published on ProPublica.org.

Remember that study the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention promised it would do to track the health of children who lived in formaldehyde-contaminated trailers provided to Hurricane Katrina victims?

Well, the Federal Emergency Management Agency finally hit the send button on a database that the CDC needs to start the study. But the database doesn’t necessarily include the current addresses of the victims, making it difficult for the CDC to track down potential participants.

“We don’t generally capture a specific address for where the
occupants went after they leave our program,” said Johnathan Torres, a
program specialist for FEMA’s Housing Operations Unit. “But we always
know their pre-disaster residence.”

Unfortunately for the CDC,
the people who lived in the trailers are a highly mobile part of the
population. Many didn’t move back to their former addresses, because
their homes were destroyed by the hurricane.

The last time we reported
on this, Dr. Heidi Sinclair, a pediatrician based in Baton Rouge, La.,
commented on the difficulty of CDC’s task. “These people are going to
be impossible to track down. Most of them have pay-as-you-go cell
phones and have already moved,” Sinclair said. “CDC should have started
doing this a year before they wanted to start the study.”

Exposure
to formaldehyde can increase the risk of cancer and asthma attacks and
can cause severe skin, ear, nose and throat irritations, especially
among children and the elderly. The chemical is found in the glue that
is used to make plywood and particleboard in most trailers.

In February 2008, the CDC released test results
showing that people living in the trailers were exposed to levels of
formaldehyde far higher than what the government considers safe. This
countered the conclusions of a CDC study done a year earlier, which was
misused (PDF) by FEMA to tell Congress and the public that the formaldehyde did not reach “a level of concern.”

The
CDC started talking about doing a long-term examination of how children
were affected by the formaldehyde more than a year ago, but it still
hasn’t finalized a methodology for the study, according to Michael
McGeehin, the CDC official leading it.

In an e-mail to
ProPublica this week, McGeehin added that the agency won’t reveal the
details of the methodology until “a candidate is chosen to serve as a
contractor on this project” and the contractor gets a chance to help
shape the methodology.

A CDC PowerPoint presentation
(PDF) obtained by ProPublica shows that the CDC had originally planned
to get the study’s methodology approved by the White House’s Office of
Management and Budget in May 2008. But the CDC didn’t request the data it just received from FEMA until June 2008. FEMA previously cited privacy concerns to explain why it didn’t provide the information sooner.

We
have submitted a FOIA request for the database to see if we can get a
sense of how many current addresses are in it. To avoid any privacy
issues, we asked the CDC to redact names of individuals in the data.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate