New Music: The Prodigy – Invaders Must Die

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Today witnesses the long-awaited return of an alternative-radio behemoth who sold millions of albums, a band that was once hailed as the”next big thing” but kind of went away, and now is releasing a new album, hoping to recapture a little of the original mojo. If you somehow missed the headline, you might have thought I was talking about Irish egoistes U2 (whose HRC-saluting No Line on the Horizon comes out today), but no, I’m speaking of The Prodigy, the UK combo that, along with The Chemical Brothers and Daft Punk, broke through the grunge-rock hegemony with a crowd-pleasing brand of arena-techno in the mid-to-late ’90s. However, among their “Electronica” comrades, The Prodigy is a unique concept: a one-man band with roots deep in the UK underground rave scene that became, depending on your perspective, cynical sellouts, a fun show to see in between Foo Fighters and Oasis concerts, or a brilliantly successful KLF-style theatrical art-prank. Their new album, the charmingly titled Invaders Must Die, bugs me, but I’m not sure it’s terrible, and the wild mix of reviews confirms the band’s slippery meaning.

On the one hand, to even the most patient fan of hardcore electronic noise (hi there!), Invaders is cartoonishly brutal. There are song titles like “Warrior’s Dance” and “Run With the Wolves”—is Robert Bly a co-writer? Rolling Stone correctly identifies the album’s sound as “pummeling, vacuous rave noise,” and ascribes the ridiculously thumpy title track to the same empty posturing that brought us 1997’s controversial “Smack My Bitch Up.” They give the album 1 1/2 out of 5 stars. On the other end of the spectrum, Spin looks kindly on the band’s “anthemic breakbeat spazz,” acknowledging that it’s “retro” but giving props to founder/producer/everything-but-dancer-and-screamer Liam Howlett’s programming skills and awareness of musical history, offering 4/5 stars. Pitchfork comes right down the middle with a 5.8/10 review, calling the more sonically extreme sections of the album “lunkheaded,” but hearing echoes of the band’s first album, 1992’s ravey, silly, and wildly enjoyable Experience.Say what you will, but 12 years ago, “Firestarter” and “Smack My Bitch Up” were genuinely shocking, electronic experiments with roots in drum ‘n’ bass joined to a winking, neo-Sex Pistols aethetic. “Bitch,” especially, was an arrow to the heart of the zeitgeist—its Electro Ultramagnetic MCs sample came at a moment when the argument over hip-hop’s use of violent, sexist imagery was just starting to boil, and only turned up the heat. Were the original lyrics sung in character, and did the recontextualization of that line enhance or remove its original meaning? It seemed like a fascinating question at the time, but the music hasn’t aged well: like Eminem, The Prodigy were once indispensable for the party DJ, but I can’t remember the last time I’ve played one of their songs.

Ultimately, 17 years removed from his underground roots, Howlett’s tunes have strayed too far from their creative mulch. If you’re a “300”-loving bro or a System of a Down fan looking for pummeling, rowdy drum ‘n’ bass, Pendulum have taken up that mantle with gusto. On the other hand, with wobbly, weird retro-rave sounds currently in vogue across the underground dance music spectrum, The Prodigy have been overtaken on that front too. Invaders Must Die is intermittently enjoyable, but ultimately, its greatest failing is that it’s completely inessential.

Invaders Must Die is out now on the band’s own label, Take Me To the Hospital.

The Prodigy – “Omen” (from Invaders Must Die)

The Prodigy – “Out of Space” (from Experience, 1992)

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate