The Obama Vegetable Garden

Image by Flikr user bob.stovall

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


When Obama was
elected back in November, activists had high hopes that he’d demonstrate liberal values with personal changes at the executive mansion. Never mind that presidential limousine; ride bicycles. Plant a garden. Serve quinoa at state dinners. Send the girls to public school.

And then the Obamas turned out to be, well, yuppies. They
sent their kids to Sidwell Friends. They’re redecorating the second floor using furniture from Pottery Barn. They even retained George W. Bush’s White House cook, a woman who once served beef tenderloin and cheese grits to the prime minister of Denmark.

But now there’s hope again. From Oprah’s interview with the first lady comes news (via Treehugger) that the Obamas will plant a White House vegetable garden:

Michelle Obama: We’re also working on a wonderful new garden project.

Oprah: Will kids get to visit the garden?

Michelle Obama: We want to use it as a point of education, to talk about health and how delicious it is to eat fresh food, and how you can take that food and make it part of a healthy diet. You know, the tomato that’s from your garden tastes very different from one that isn’t. And peas – what is it like to eat peas in season? So we want the White House to be a place of education and awareness. And hopefully kids will be interested because there are kids living here.

The local food people will love this. The hope is that the first
family will encourage Americans to give up those wasteful lawns and plant gardens again, thus diminishing American fossil fuel usage and unhealthy agricultural practices.

It is a little more complicated than that, however. The White House lawns have long been more decorative than
practical. Michael Pollan, a longtime proponent of turning acres of the White House into a garden, once requested a list of pesticides used on the grounds. He was refused.

But vegetable gardens at the White House are nothing new. John Adams, the building’s first resident, added one in 1800. By the early twentieth century the West end of the White House (where the Oval Office is today) consisted of a rambling series of greenhouses that supplied plants to the president’s family all year round.

The Obama garden would not be the first time the president’s family used the grounds to lend a hand to the nation, either. Woodrow Wilson let sheep graze on the South Lawn to produce wool during World War I. Eleanor Roosevelt planted a victory garden in 1943.

Even more recently, Jimmy Carter planted herbs between the flowers. Since the Clinton administration, the staff has harvested food from a vegetable garden on the roof.

The new garden is a nice idea, but it runs the risk of coming off a little hollow, since the White House is famous for toothless token gestures. When Jacqueline Kennedy wanted to express concern about poverty in West Virginia, she ordered new White House glasses from the Morgantown Glassware factory. The company still closed in 1971, and West Virginia continues to have the third lowest per capita income in the country.

Later, President Carter installed solar panels, an energy solution wildly outside of the average American’s price range, during the energy crisis, a move critics panned extensively. Reagan removed the solar panels immediately after he moved in.

Symbolic changes in the White House only work when accompanied by effective policy fixes. Let’s see what happens the next time the farm bill rolls around. At this point an Obama-led food revolution is doubtful, particularly given the president’s selection of agribusiness-crony Tom Vilsack as agriculture secretary.

But it is certainly worth a try. I spent a large portion of my Vermont childhood picking pesticide-free beans and chards, so I understand a direct relationship with vegetables and dirt helps people understand what food is and what we put into our bodies. I appreciate that Obama is trying. And who knows, with 18 acres to farm and only five mouths to feed, the White House will surely produce a surplus. Maybe 1600 Pennsylvania Ave will turn out some good tomatoes for DC to eat.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate