California’s Charitable E-Bingo Is E-Liminated

Photo courtesy of Star Casino Entertainment and the Comanche Nation

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Californians can say goodbye to the electronic bingo machines (better known as e-bingo) in their charitable bingo halls thanks to a ban signed by Gov. Schwarzenegger that takes effect tomorrow. Turns out that bingo isn’t just good old-fashioned fun anymore. Instead, it’s at the center of a fight between nonprofits and Native American tribes who are all clamoring after bingo’s big money.  

Federally recognized tribes will still get to operate the machines on their reservation land, but charities will have to shut theirs down. Despite a few upshots for charitable bingo operators in the new law, like an increase on prize caps from $250 to $500 for traditional bingo games, the e-bingo ban still puts them on the losing end because many have come to rely on the machines to keep their business afloat.

Doug Pringle, who operated 80-plus machines out of Sacramento’s North Watt hall for his nonprofit, Disabled Sports USA, worries that he won’t be able to fulfill the terms of his 5-year lease without e-bingo. “Even if we close this building, we’re obligated to about $850,000 in rent over the next 2 years,” he said. “How are we going to replace three-quarters of a million dollars?”

Yes, millions of dollars. That’s what’s at stake in California’s bingo industry. Halls in Sacramento County alone raised $55 million from July 2007 to July 2008. But not all of it is going to charity. Little more than 8 percent of what charitable halls rake in actually finds its way to sick children or soup kitchens.

Bingo operators owe their big bucks to a legal loophole that lets nonprofits offer the game as a fundraiser in 48 states. Bingo halls, which dot the strip malls of working class America everywhere, have a similar look: windows blackened, with the size, odor, and ambiance of a bowling alley. Nearly all bingo halls in the US still offer old-fashioned bingo games—the kind that requires paper cards and ink markers—but they’re grossly out of style. Today’s bingo is digital.

An e-bingo machine could easily be mistaken for a slot machine: both are fridge-sized and feature video simulations of spinning reels. But it’s higher on the evolutionary ladder than a typical slot machine because it allows players to compete against each other instead of against the machine.

That’s where the Native American tribes come in. E-bingo technology evolved out of their demand for a game that would bring in the revenue of slot machines, but fit into the technical category of bingo under the rules of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. The Act allows tribes to run all the bingo they want on their reservations without making compacts with state and local governments. (Whereas, to run Vegas-style casinos, they need to make an arrangement that involves dishing out a portion of the revenue to the state.) When Indian casinos saw that nonprofits were adopting e-bingo in their own charitable halls—which were in direct competition with nearby Indian casinos—many tribes didn’t only see it as a threat to their revenue; they saw it as a threat to their sovereignty.

So, for example, the United Auburn Tribe, which operates Thunder Valley Casino, threatened to withhold millions of dollars from the state if charitable bingo halls continued to run the machines in their halls. Apparently those were dollars that the Governator wasn’t willing to part with, especially during California’s budgetary crisis

My suggestion is for Californians to get in all the e-bingo they can at their local charitable hall before those screens go dark. Because gambling for charity doesn’t really count as gambling … right?

 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate