April 5, 2009

Can Chris Paul Save New Orleans?

Courtesy of <a href="http://layupdrill.com" target="new">LayUpDrill.com</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

A remarkable thing has happened in New Orleans and for once an NBA star deserves more praise and worship then he’s getting. Let me set the scene: the state of Louisiana now subsidizes its NBA team, the New Orleans Hornets, to prevent them from leaving after Katrina decimated their already weak market. This agreement was reached last season, when it looked as if the Hornets were likely to lose $20 million and would need to search for a new city. Louisiana paid the team $6.5 million, no small amount considering the state budget deficit was $341 million. This year, officials estimated those payments to rise to $7 million, even as the budget deficit balloons to more than $2 billion.

Back to that remarkable thing: this season the Hornets lead the league with a 38.6% increase in attendance and are up to a respectable average of 16,976 fans per game. Against all odds the Hornets will surpass attendance and revenue benchmarks, triggering a clause in their deal with the state so that they no longer receive the state money. That extra $7 million is an unexpected boon and one of the only good pieces of news coming out of Louisiana, where Gov Bobby Jindal has talked about refusing stimulus money while pushing massive cuts for state programs. So why is no one talking about the wonderful Hornets player largely responsible for all of this? Why no buzz about the one-man recession fighting machine? 

Doug Thornton of SMG, the company that manages the New Orleans Arena for the state, had this to say to the AP:

What it really means is the fans of New Orleans supported the team and it’s really a testament to the management of the organization that the team is doing such a great job this year.

Huh? Management of the organization? Not the same management that tried to trade one of their top three players in a bald cost-cutting move only to have the trade fall through when the player failed his physical. Not owner George Shinn, who holds a special spot in the pantheon of evil team owners. Not the same fans that didn’t support the team even before Katrina, didn’t start showing up until well after the team was good, and haven’t been able to support professional basketball dating back to the Jazz and the ABA’s Buccaneers.

Any and all credit needs to go to Hornets star Chris Paul. If you don’t know the name (and no, NO relation to Ron Paul), get to know it, because Chris Paul is the best point guard since Magic Johnson and, with all due respect to Zeke, the best little man of all time.  Great basketball players are celebrated for their ability to elevate the players around them, well, Paul is so good he elevates his teammates, elevates the coach, the owner, the fans, hell he’s trying to save the world. He has already been widely credited with saving the NBA in New Orleans, and for some time he has been the face of recovery in New Orleans. Now he’s taking on the state budget.

And this reverse bailout of sorts comes at a time when the NBA, and sports in general, are struggling like the rest of the economy. It didn’t look good for the Hornets last season and that was before the recession. NBA teams are dropping left and right. The league just took out a $200 million dollar loan to help 12 teams shore up “operating losses incurred because of the economy.” Suddenly the once proud franchises in Indianapolis and Sacramento are in jeopardy. And while the contractual nature of broadcast and sponsorship deals have helped to insulate the NBA as a whole, the league is still having all sorts of problems. Chief among them are the looming negotiations of a new Collective Bargaining Agreement. The last time a lockout happened it took the league a decade to recover. Who knows what lockout plus recession equals, maybe even Chris Paul won’t be enough.

Update (4/9/09): Hornets decide to take NBA bailout money after all.

 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate