What’s Wrong with Independent Bookstores

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Courtesy of Tim Dickinson

So we recently lost our local bookstore. MoJo really tried to support Stacey’s on Market St,* our research team went there before Amazon, we bought lots of gift certificates, we are sad to see them go. Well, mostly. I know this is sacrilege, but I actually thought the store was frustrating and found it a struggle to shop there. And Stacey’s isn’t the only guilty party. I have seen other indy bookstores follow these troubling trends that lead customers to, gasp, Amazon. I’m not under any illusions that my piddly gripes are why Stacey’s closed, or why Cody’s did before them (and the list in each city goes on), but they sure didn’t help matters.

Lots of floors/sections, not lots of signs
The trend in most independent bookstores seems to be to steer the reader to the customer service kiosk. Which is great, to talk to a live human with knowledge, but not great if they are on the phone, or nowhere to be found, or just plain huffy that they need to tell the hundreth person where to find Atlas Shrugged. People need to be instantly gratified and they don’t like to get lost, so make it easy, or at least easier.

I know you know more than I do
So it’s shocking and all kinds of wrong that the guy behind the counter at Barnes & Noble has to look up who Toni Morrison is (?!) but lots of bookish folks go the other way at mom-and-pop shops. How can I not know the complete works of Dostoyevsky? Sorry, I am not as smart as you, and sometimes I don’t even know the title or the author of the book I am looking for, and certainly not how to find it according to your store’s Dewey Decimal code. Cut me some slack, or I might go back to Barnes & Noble where I feel smart.

We should have it…
The classic fake out. You ask the (huffy) customer service person if they have a book and he/she looks it up in their computer and says it should be in Philosophy or wherever, and it’s not. Either because someone swiped the last copy, or because someone picked it up and dropped it off somewhere in the stacks, or because the computer isn’t as up to date as the shelf is. Bottom line, I don’t find my book and I don’t pay the store. Lose lose. I know, this is hard to fix. RFID tags maybe?

Nowhere to sit
I do agree that you shouldn’t sit in a bookstore and read the book, or god forbid, a magazine, and not pay for it, but please, give people a place to linger and sample the merchandise. Borders and Barnes & Noble get this. They may go overboard with the latte cafes in the corner, but they also have benches scattered around the stacks. In most indy bookstores you’re lucky if you can commandeer a step stool (and I admit, when you are lucky enough to do so it’s a victory to savor).

Give me used
Why is it that most independent booksellers either sell all new books or all used, with no hybrids? I am sure there is a very good, business-sense reason for this, but as a customer I’d like to see if they have the used variety and also sample the newer offerings.

I know, I am totally that dissatisfied, lazy consumer who wants it all from her local book purveyor. And if I can’t get it I (if I am someone who doesn’t live near a wealth of alt indy bookstores) turn to Powell’s (hopefully), or, hopefully not, Amazon, and lead to the demise of the very industry that I care so much about. But I am not condemning all bookstores, there are total stars in my book (my favorite is Coas in Las Cruces, Moe’s in Berkeley is a close second), just the characteristics that hold some back from winning spoiled converts. So I will march down to Alexander Book Co. or over to City Lights, and I will love the smell only bound paper can muster, and I will temper my expectations, but I won’t miss Stacey’s; sorry, I just won’t.

*The Stacey’s letters are for sale for $500, more details here.


If you buy a book using a Bookshop link on this page, a small share of the proceeds supports our journalism.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate