Can Birth Control Use Change Your Career?

Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


With all the speculation about what led to the current financial crisis, it’s not surprising that yet another study has linked testosterone with financial risk-taking. But this latest study, an experiment involving MBA students at the University of Chicago and Northwestern University, was a little different. It showed that some men and women had similar testosterone levels, and thus (the study’s authors found) similar levels of risk-aversion.

Women with high testosterone levels were seven times more likely to take risks than women with low testosterone levels. In addition, 90% of female students in the study and 31% of the male students had “low” levels of testosterone, and acted exactly the same in terms of risk-averse fiscal investment.

One thing the study didn’t look into was birth control. Most women’s contraception is hormone based, and research shows that it not only lowers a woman’s testosterone levels while she’s on it: it keeps her testosterone low years after she’s stopped. Theoretically, women who don’t use hormonal contraception will have more testosterone, and as a result, will be less risk-averse than women on the pill. And according to the new University of Chicago study, women with more testosterone are more likely to work in risky environments like an investment bank or trade floor. So maybe if 22% of US women ages 15 to 44 weren’t on the pill, there would be more women working in the financial sector. Or maybe just a lot more accidental pregnancies. 

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate