Solar-Powered Schools

Photocredit: The Green Schools Alliance

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


When bank robber Willie Sutton was asked why he knocked over those temples of finance, he famously replied: “Because that’s where the money is.”

Duh.

And yet, even with a growing understanding of global warming and the realization that fossil fuels are finite, we’re having a hard time implementing Mr. Sutton’s wise, if obvious, rule: get the biggest bang for your buck. (Actually, Sutton’s rule is more accurately rephrased as “getting the biggest bucks for your bang.”)

Every day, millions of children, tweens and teenagers, leave their homes to spend the day in  school. And no matter how “green” parents try to make things at home, an enormous amount of energy is used to keep the kids cool (on hot days) and warm (on cold ones). According to the Green Schools Initiative, US schools spend around $6 billion dollars a year on energy.

A couple of other important things about schools — they usually have large amounts of roof space. And schools are mostly occupied when the sun is out. It should be easy to put solar panels up on the old rooftop and generate clean, renewable energy.

It should be. But it isn’t.

Our regulatory system acts as a kind of beauracratic bank vault, keeping eletrons locked up, so that we have to pay a utility to burn more fossil fuels and produce eletricity the old fashioned way — expensive, polluting, wasteful.

That didn’t make much sense to the Scottsdale, Arizona school system. With 300-plus clear days a year, they thought about the sun the same way Willie Sutton thought of banks.

That was a year ago. Last Wednesday, the district received approval to sign a contract with a solar installation company to buy electricity at a reduced rate from solar panels owned by the company and placed on the school’s roof.

Two major hurdles had to be cleared (the full story is here).

  • The state legislature had to pass a law allowing schools to buy electricity from an entity other than a traditional utility. That legislation was signed into law this summer.
  • The Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC), which regulates utilities, had to decide if non-utilities could sell power to schools. The ACC ruled this week that the Scottsdale schools could, as a special case, enter into power purchase agreements with the California-based company, SolarCity.

Solar panels will be gracing the rooftops of two Scottsdale high schools soon. As for other schools throughout Arizona — they’re awaiting a finally ruling by the ACC. Are companies like SolarCity and SunRun (which has a similar program) “utilities” subject to ACC regs? And if they are, what regulations should apply?

The good news is that the ACC has been as pro-renewable power and consumer-friendly as any in the nation, under the leadership of chairwoman Kris Mayes. The head of the Vote Solar Initiative, Adam Browning, has called her “a rock star” of the solar movement.

The bad news is that even with visionary leaders like Mayes, the old dirty energy system — the source of so many social, strategic, environmental and health problems — slows progress to a crawl — at a moment in history that requires a sprint.

 

Osh Gray Davidson is contributing blogger for Mother Jones and publisher of the online solar energy news service, The Phoenix Sun.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate