The Secret to Better Burgers? Lots of Flies.

Insects could reduce food waste and feed livestock in one fell swoop.

Yum! Kyle Platts

Even though insects are extremely nutritious and emit little greenhouse gas, they probably don’t make your mouth water: Here in the United States, dining on bugs is still taboo. Chances are we’re not going to replace bacon with smoked beetles or wolf down meatballs made of ground fly larvae anytime soon. Animals, though, have no qualms about devouring bugs. I’ve seen otherwise tame hens stampede through grass like bulls to pluck a fresh insect.

Hear Four Fish: The Future of the Last Wild Food author and lifetime fisherman Paul Greenberg discuss how using insects for feed could help us save our wild fish populations on Bite podcast. The interview starts at 10:12 of the episode below.

Strange, then, that feeding bugs to livestock remains an exotic practice on the factory farms that churn out the vast majority of America’s meat. And that’s a shame: It takes nearly 25 pounds of feed—think huge monocrops of corn and soybeans—to raise a pound of beef, 9 pounds of feed to raise a pound of pork, and 4.5 pounds of feed to raise a pound of chicken. Growing all that grain is tough on the planet, boosting soil erosion and requiring enormous amounts of fertilizers and pesticides. Insects, on the other hand, are beautifully efficient: They thrive on landfill-bound food waste and reach maturity without fertilizer (or, obviously, pesticides).

So could insects offset grain as the main course in animal feed? Scientists think so. In a 2013 research review, UN experts sang the praises of the black soldier fly. Unlike houseflies, adult black soldier flies aren’t vectors of human disease, and they’re not attracted to our habitats. They reproduce swiftly, inhibiting the growth of bacteria and keeping odors to a minimum. The flies can breed everywhere from farms to dense urban areas and can turn almost any organic matter into larvae—something we won’t eat but farm animals will.

The benefits might not stop at the water’s edge. Two-thirds of America’s salmon are farmed: One pound of salmon takes up to five pounds of wild-caught forage fish—sardines, anchovies, and others that may be overfished, imperiling oceanic food chains. But soldier fly larvae contain almost as much protein as fish meal and are less carbon-intensive to produce. With about 20 percent of global fish meal going to pig feed, scaling up larvae production could make raising both land and sea creatures easier on the oceans.

A handful of startups are already at work on the fly-to-feed project. EnviroFlight, located in Yellow Springs, Ohio, feeds byproducts from food processing—like unused dough—to soldier flies. Their larvae are sold to nearby salmon and trout farms and as food for pets and backyard chickens. EnviroFlight hopes to get into the hog and poultry markets, too. And Mad Agriculture of Boulder, Colorado, plans to use spent brewing grains and pulp from juicing as feed for soldier flies whose larvae are bound for free-range chickens.

The bug-feed industry is in its infancy, with regulatory hurdles to cross. In the United States, novel foods for animals have to be approved by a public-private review body run by the Association of American Feed Control Officials, and the process is cumbersome. But the companies got a major boost in July 2016 when the Food and Drug Administration approved dried larvae from black soldier flies as a food for salmon.

Phil Taylor, the CEO and co-founder of Mad Agriculture and an ecology researcher at the University of Colorado, thinks companies like his are ahead of the curve. He envisions people establishing soldier fly colonies to eat “tailpipe” waste from meat-processing plants, bakeries, breweries, and restaurants across the country. Taylor estimates we could save 250,000 cars’ worth of carbon emissions by using just 5 percent of US food waste to grow black soldier fly larvae instead of producing fish meal. With roughly 6 percent of the UN estimate of global food waste, we could replace the entire world’s fish meal market—a feat that would yield the carbon savings equivalent of ditching two-thirds of the globe’s vehicles.

Taylor notes that “natural systems have no waste”—one critter’s refuse quickly becomes another’s feast. By replacing resource-intensive grain and fish with abundant and nutritious insects in livestock feed, we could begin to make industrial agriculture work like an ecosystem. And for most Americans, that’s a much more appetizing prospect than encountering these industrious insects on the dinner table.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate