12yo Rape Victim Not to Be Believed, Say School Admins

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The reported rape of a 12-year-old girl by a 14-year-old boy in a stairwell in Portola Middle School in El Cerrito, California, has been making some disturbing waves. Even though two fellow students interrupted the assault (one went to get a teacher, while the other physically intervened), school admins are just not so sure we should call it rape just yet. The school’s principal and vice-principal have been placed on administrative leave. A sampling of cover-your-butt denialism:

School site supervisor Mustapha Cannon: “It was hormones gone wild… I think this is something that’s been worded the wrong way… They probably just took it so far and embarrassment kicked in. As far as calling it a rape, I think it’s something that they did together and it got worded the wrong way… When this is all over with I want to see if I can get a public apology for my principal.”

Teacher Carol Renee: “I hope they’re [school principal and vice-principal] not being blamed for anything because they’re really good administrators and we need them back here… I think the situation is being exploited. I think not everything is going to be as it seems.”

School site supervisor Marquita Dones: “If she was being raped, why didn’t she scream? Why did these students have to come up and tell us that somebody’s down there?”

Cannon again: “I know the girl and I know the guy… I know for a fact that that girl could’ve knocked that guy out with one hand tied behind her back.”

Are you noticing a trend here? These school employees are saying a 12-year-old girl, who legally CANNOT CONSENT to sexual activity, wasn’t raped. Either because she wanted it, or because she didn’t fight hard enough, or because it would be *really* inconvenient for school officials. SHE IS TWELVE. She can’t legally have “sex,” not in a stairwell, not in school, not anywhere. “12-YEAR-OLDS CAN’T CONSENT.” Maybe school employees should be required to write this on the blackboard 100 times a day until they get it. Granted, these school employees have a vested interest in saying it wasn’t rape, but it’s unconscionable, and a sign of rape culture’s pervasiveness, that they immediately dismissed the claims.

Despite Cannon’s “hormones gone wild” theory of sexual assault, a recent investigative report by the Center for Public Integrity found that rape by fellow students continues well past adolescence into college years. The report showed that the few women who do report rapes by fellow students (an estimated 10% of all victims), they encounter a campus bureaucracy tilted in favor of the perpetrators. Campus rules often stipulate mediation or closed hearings. One student from Bucknell University who was raped reported it to campus police, and was sent to mediation to discuss with her rapist what had happened. She says it was “a horrible experience… I was in a tiny, little room, no more than an arm’s reach from my assailant.” Even though her assailant agreed he had raped her, because of confidentiality agreements, she wasn’t able to pursue him in the justice system. “People who work for the university might be serving their own interests, and they might not,” she said. Given the circumstances, she wished she had ignored campus administration and gone straight to law enforcement.

In the case of the 12-year-old, law enforcement does tell a different story than school admins. Another sampling:

El Cerrito Commander Michael Regan: “The location where the assault actually occurred, you can’t see that location unless you’re standing at the base of the stairs. So somebody from another floor, unless they heard the incident, wouldn’t have known that it occurred… If this assault wasn’t interrupted by the student that passed by, there’s no telling how long the assault would have continued.”

El Cerrito police Chief Scott Kirkland: “It is interesting, the criminal mind. When a situation like this occurs, to actually do something like this… you have to be a little sick.”

Juvenile prosecutor Dan Cabral: “A child under the age of 14 cannot be touched… Regardless of consent or not, no person in the State of California is allowed to touch a child under the age of 14 for purposes of sexual gratification.”

I think the last quote says it all. Twelve years old = rape. Even if she’s big for her age. Even if you didn’t hear her scream. It seems so simple. So why do we keep trying to excuse it away?

 

 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate