How We Got MLK Day and Who Stood in the Way


Martin Luther King, Jr. famously fought long and hard for racial equality. So perhaps it’s fitting that it took the efforts of several Americans more than 30 years to establish a holiday in his honor.

Here are some of MLK Day’s most prominent champions and adversaries—including John McCain, Stevie Wonder, and Ronald Reagan.

Photos: Wikimedia Commons

Click here to see more Mother Jones slideshows.

1968: Four days after MLK is assassinated in Memphis, Rep. John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI), a founding member of the Congressional Black Caucus, introduces legislation in the House to establish a holiday in his honor.

 

1968: Sen. Edward Brooke (R-MA), the first African-American Senator elected by popular vote, introduces legislation to the Senate.

1969-1983: Conyers and Rep. Shirley Chisholm (D-NY) reintroduce legislation for a holiday in every single session of the House—for a total of 15 years.

 

1973: Illinois becomes the first state to authorize a statewide holiday (Massachusetts and Connecticut follow suit the next year). The legislation is sponsored by Harold Washington, the first African-American mayor of Chicago.

 

1979: Fifty years after MLK’s birth, his widow Coretta Scott King (pictured) and President Jimmy Carter breathe new life into the federal fight for a day in his honor. Inspired by Carter’s public support for legislation, Coretta organizes a nationwide citizen’s lobby and gathers 300,000 petition signatures. Nonetheless, a bill is again defeated in the House—but by only 5 votes.

 

1980: The cause gets its first celebrity advocate in the form of Stevie Wonder, who releases the song “Happy Birthday” (Sample lyric: “I just never understood/How a man who died for good/Could not have a day that would/Be set aside for his recognition.”)

Two years later, Stevie and Coretta present a petition with 6 million signatures to Congress. It is the largest petition in favor of an issue in US history.

1983: The House finally passes legislation—sponsored by Conyers and Rep. Katie Hall (D-IN)—by a decisive margin of 338-90.

 

1983: Among the nay voters on the House bill: John McCain, who later issues a mea culpa on the presidential campaign trail.

1983: Meanwhile, two other Republican Senators—North Carolina’s John P. East and Jesse Helms (pictured)—do their best to defeat legislation in the Senate. Their tactics include dwelling on King’s alleged sexual dalliances and presenting a paper accusing him of Communist connections (Patrick Moynihan (D-NY) famously responds to the latter by throwing it on the Senate floor, stomping on it, and calling it a “packet of filth.”)

 

1983: Despite the efforts of East and Helms, a bill to establish a holiday—sponsored by Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA)—passes the Senate 78-22. Ronald Reagan (pictured), who initially opposed the legislation, signs it into law.

 

1990: In protest over Arizona refusing to formally adopt the holiday, NFL commissioner Paul Tagliabue moves the Super Bowl location from Tempe to Pasadena, California (two years later, the state finally observes the holiday, and they get hosting rights back in 1996).

 

2000: South Carolina Governor Jim Hodges (pictured) signs legislation to make MLK Day a paid holiday, making his state the last to do so; previously, residents could choose to celebrate that or one of three Confederate holidays.

The same year, Virginia Governor Jim Gilmore votes to establish MLK Day a stand-alone holiday, instead of grouping it with Jackson-Lee Day—a commemoration for Confederate generals.

And Utah Governor Michael O. Leavitt changes the day from Martin Luther King, Jr. Human Rights Day to just Martin Luther King, Jr. Day.

 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate