MoJo Staffers Get LOST: A Weekly Chat

Photo courtesy ABC

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Last night, LOST kicked off its final season with a bang. Below, five Mother Jones staffers chat about Sayid’s resurrection, Hugo’s leadership abilities, Kate’s line-jumping, and what they hope the show’s enigmatic creators have in store for viewers.

Ben Buchwalter, Editorial Fellow: I’m in the chat room, reporting from 1974.
Nikki Gloudeman, New Media Fellow: Nice gchat entrance, Ben.
Jen Phillips, Assistant Editor: So what did you guys think? Did the first episode answer questions, or just frustrate you?
Nikki: I think they wanted to let fans know that they are going to give answers, by doing things like answering the smoke monster question right off the bat.
Ben: Yeah, this is a much better role for the actor formerly known as Locke.
Jen: I couldn’t take any more of Locke feeling sorry for himself. Terry O’Quinn makes an excellent badass. And he’s still got his knife!

Nikki: Favorite scene of the show? Mine was Jack and Locke rehashing their philosophical debate in the airport waiting room.
Ben: Hugo taking control and being a prophet.
Jen: Kate trying to steal a cab from Frogurt.

Jen: What do you think about Aaron? If he’s raised by someone else, will it mess things up? The psychic said Claire had to raise Aaron.
Nikki: Yes, he couldn’t be raised by “another” (or “an other”?) but why?!
Samantha Schaberg, Administrative Assistant: Isn’t Aaron the only child to be born on the island?
Nikki: What’s up with Aaron? Is he infant Jacob? He kinda looks like it. That’s my ridiculous theory of the chat!
 

Laurin Asdal, Director of Development: You know, my theory is, and this may be obvious, but when Juliet was dying and said “it worked,” I’m convinced everyone on the island will die and then they will assume their “plane didn’t crash” identities. That’s why they are telling parallel story lines.
Jen: Really? But why was Desmond on the plane? Because he never sailed to the island?
Laurin: That I can’t figure out. But he up and disappeared and he was the only person Jack recognized.
Nikki: Yes, actually there were a few key differences between what happened in the first episode [of the series] and the revised version [last night], which suggests the past before the parallel plane version is also different.
Jen: But even in new, non-crash timeline, characters are still meeting. Jack may help John, maybe Kate will still help birth Aaron…
Sam: Yes, they make the same choices.
Nikki: Will they actually make the same choices or will their subconscious knowledge of what happened on the island allow them to find redemption?
Laurin: They are destined to meet one way or the other. Hurley is totally Sawyer’s new mark.
Ben: Well, we know that the island doesn’t exist in this new timeline. But we also know that Jacob also probably exists, so maybe he’s bringing them together.

Sam: Are we sure that Jacob is the good in this?
Laurin: Well, he wears white linen.
Jen: And he weaves tapestries.
Ben: Seems like Jacob is good so far… which probably means he’s not. So is there a chance that Jacob and the man in black have a rivalry even without the island, and that Jacob is bringing everyone together in this parallel world?
Nikki: Oh that’d be interesting… so they exist in the world where the island is submerged too.
Laurin: They showed the man in black being angry with Jacob for allowing new visitors to the island.
Ben: The man in black constantly refers to setting people free by killing Jacob.
Jen: Right, so now that Jacob’s dead, it means we can all go on our merry ways, right? 😉
Sam: Jacob seems to still have that influence from the other side, he sent Hugo to the temple where Sayid was brought back to life.
Ben: Yeah was anyone surprised when Sayid came back to life?
Laurin: Not when multiple people can communicate with folks in the afterlife. What a handy talent. What do you think the substance is that protects people from the smoke monster? I found that hilarious.
Sam: Yes, I want to know what that is too, ashes of what?
Jen: Whatever they burned to make the ashes, it was big…
Nikki: It seems to be the same substance surrounding the scary cabin where Jacob resided. Some sort of ash to keep out—or in—non-corporeal entities. It would explain why the presence was trapped in the cabin, begging for help.
Laurin: Losties all, I wish I could continue but have a meeting. Too much good stuff. Cannot wait until next week! I love chatting with LOST fans. Dorking out is my favorite hobby!
Jen: Gah, okay one last one, what do you think of “the Others” now that you’ve seen them living in the temple?
Nikki: I keep thinking about what they kept saying a few seasons ago, “We’re the good guys.”
Sam: That’s my whole thing, I think everything we’ve been led to think is bad will be actually good.
Nikki: They seem to have some ancient power to keep watch over humanity, but they seem a little cranky to me.
Jen: Cranky and powerful. Sounds like the God of the Old Testament. Any last last thoughts before we end?
Ben: Sawyer: B-) man in black: x-( Locke: 🙁 Jack: 😐 Kate: :'(
Nikki: excellent! Maybe LOST is just based on emoticons. We’ve cracked the code! And with that, goodbye my fellow Losties. Until next week…namaste.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate