Angelo Spencer Channels Kurtz

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Angelo Spencer et Les Hauts Sommets
s/t
K Records

What do you get when you cross Miles Davis, Clint Eastwood’s American West, and the festering wildness of Lord of the Flies? Answer: Angelo Spencer et Les Haut Sommets (translation: the high summits). Spencer, in fact, grew up in the French Alps watching spaghetti westerns—he now lives in Olympia, Washington, the rainy hometown of Olympia beer and K Records.

Out this week, his debut will probably be deemed indie, experimental, and alt-rock. But more than anything it is a cinematic, instrumental trip through the deepest jungle—full of cerebral harbingers of something along the lines of Joseph Conrad’s Mr. Kurtz. While the 10-track album doesn’t impart sadness, it delivers a dark tale without benefit of human voices. Les Hauts Sommets’ music presupposes imagery, and what follows are some of the images I took away from the album, although I’m sure there are many others.

“Now!” the opening track, announces the band’s intricate collection of instruments—guitars, drums, tambourine, bells, shakers, keys, and clarinet—like forest animals emerging from hiding. “Northwest,” rustles you awake inside of a dream; as the scene comes into focus you notice that you are among others, a procession of wanderers, moving at night to the beat of a bass drum. Spencer’s twangy guitar comes in and out, allowing room for the other instruments to speak, like conversational jazz.

The third track is an upbeat jaunt to break up its eerier counterparts, while track four, “Did You Hear the Sound of…” is exactly what it sounds like. Above an echoey dirge of bass drum, bells, and guitar, the clarinet unleashes a tortured siren of a bird. You can picture every human turning suddenly in its direction, wondering what sort of creature, obscured by darkness, has entered their presence. The music’s starkness reminds me of Neil Young’s score for the 1995 postmodern western Dead Man, which opens in a mid-19th-century mining camp and journeys bleary-eyed through the backcountry from the Southwest to the Northwest.

Track five is my least favorite, but it makes sense within the larger narrative. It’s the chase scene—surf rock on speed, and a cross between Mad Max and a tribal hunt. Six and seven are short, Leo-Kottke-esque interludes. One of my favorites, “La Pinaille” comes next, bursting with a second wind. That’s when you know you’re listening to a really, really good album. Eight songs in, and they’re still surprising; there’s still more to the story. Spencer’s energetic guitar licks, moored by the bass drum, are interspersed with quick handclaps.

Track nine, “Le Mont Pourri,” concludes with the sound of spinning vinyl grinding to a halt, as if the story were being sucked back into its crystal ball. And the final track feels like an encore. It may be the most lighthearted song on the album: full-bodied and loud, but dropping off at times to allow Spencer’s guitar to pop into the foreground. It also manages to pull everything together, leaving you back where you started, and wondering if it were all a dream.

So I would recommend this record to anyone, regardless of musical taste. And I’m curious to see the sort of critical reaction it gets. Because personally, I can’t stop listening to it.     

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate