Twitter: @Ethics in 140 Characters

Flickr/<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/libraryman/" target="_blank">libraryman</a> (<a href="http://creativecommons.org/" target="_blank">Creative Commons</a>)

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


    Can you have Ethics in 140 characters? It’s a question of ‘great social and political import’ (to borrow the phrase) to the folks over at Twitter, Social Media’s secretly earnest smart alec kid sister. So important, in fact, they’ve devoted a department to it. 

“I think about ethics all the time,” said Del Harvey, who heads up Twitter’s Trust and Safety Dept., hidden somewhere past the green fiberglass deer in their San Francisco HQ, which is just as cool as everybody always told you it was. “I have a 21-person staff that thinks about ethics and the ethical ramifications of things also all the time.”   

Think about, sure. Define, not so much.

The only consensus so far is that the Internet is a tool, one that can be used for good or for evil. Or as one Orthodox Twitterer recently put it to me ” [The Web]’s like a baseball bat. You could start a little league team in your community or you could mug someone.” So what, then, are Social Media Ethics? To answer that, the micro-blogging site imported a panel of experts that sounds like the set-up to a bad joke–a rabbi, a lawyer and a blogger–plus a psychologist, an entrepreneur and a data-analyst to the company’s posh SOMA offices.  The conversation was called Jewish Ethics and the Internet, but kosher meal aside, the themes were fairly universal. 

Chief among them: How should we behave on the Web now that there are more active Facebook users than US Citizens and we  spend more time online than we spend sleeping?

 

 “We don’t really know the rules or the etiquette,” said Deborah Schultz, the social media evangelist who headlined the event. “We don’t have the proper language today to describe the kind of relationships we have [online]. How can you be ‘friends’ with 5,000 people on Facebook?” (spoiler: you can’t)

Better known than our “friends” are our enemies: Trolls, SPAMers, and good old-fashioned bullies. Frequent visitors to our site will be familiar with SPAM, but for the uninitiated, ‘troll’ is Web-speak for users who lob Molotov cocktails into the ladies’ teas of the internet (such as they are), spewing bile into forums, chat-threads and article comments and chuckling at the chaos that ensues.  

“I’ll have a post with 85 comments, all of them negative,” said blogger-comedian Heshy Fried, who rides under the banner Frum Satire and has an online following about 20,000 strong (to give some perspective, that’s about 10 percent of ur-blogger Kevin Drum’s traffic–except instead of America’s politically engaged left, FrumSatire’s bread-and-butter constituency is Orthodox Jews). “When I post something to Facebook, I’ll get 100 comments about who I’m trying to offend.”

But nothing defines the ethics debate more profoundly than the generation gap. 

“Parents are like digital immigrants,” said Dr. David Pelcovitz, who teaches at Yeshiva University in New York. “Kids are the natives. It’s like what always happens when you’re a first generation native, you can pull the wool over the eyes of your immigrant parents.” 

 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate