Music Monday: My Goldfrapp Top 10

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Goldfrapp
Head First
Mute

Head First, the fifth full album from Goldfrapp, came out last week, and boy, is it lovely! Who knew late-’70s/early ’80s synth-pop could be so perfectly compact, so life-affirming and seemingly effortless? Anyone who’s ever roller-skated to the Xanadu soundtrack or listened to the full ABBA catalog too many times, that’s probably who. And yet that extremely gay sentence only begins to overanalyze this marvelous new musical emission from forty-something English songstress Allison Goldfrapp and composer Will Gregory. Here’s a list of 10 flowery observations compiled over nearly a dozen listens in varying states of attentiveness: 

1. “Rocket,” the first track and first single: So rebelliously joyous in the face of hard-earned world-weariness, it embodies the creamy illusionism of pop, the compulsive, addictive structure that gives three-minute musical confections this aura: melodic, tightly structured, self-contained solutions to reality that are at once outrageously far-fetched, naively enthusiastic, sincere, and disposable. Things not going so well? Send the bastard away on a rocket! 

2. Driven by something like an infinitely better, more musically evolved version of Jean Michel Jarre’s repetitive synth-ditty “Orient Express,” “Rocket” is at once moving, silly, and capable of being enjoyed without a thought as to whether or not it’s moving or silly or what. Not to mention it’s the catchiest, happy-go-luckiest song about sending away an irritating lover (possibly) on a rocket. (Oh-oh-oh / I’ve gotta rocket / Oh-oh-oh / You’re going on it / Oh-oh-oh / You’re never coming back.)

3. Like most ABBA creations, so many of the songs (especially “Alive,” one of my favorite tracks, with its bouncing bass piano-line) seem like naturally occurring phenomena almost immediately. As though they had been waiting to be written into existence—and once they’ve been heard, seem to have existed forever. They have the flavor of something completely familiar and yet somehow new, something taken for granted and yet only just now appearing.  

4. Even though every homosexual I’ve talked to in the last week says that Supernature will remain their favorite Goldfrapp album thus far, Head First is nothing to shake a stick at. It’s a scream.

5. Embodies now and then—like in the lead-in to “I Wanna Life“—that dire urgency of the decades it draws upon: the sense that life hinges on giving oneself over completely to the sharpness, the narcotic intensity of a fully committed four-minute musical moment.  

6. A different part of the Goldfrapp animal: that fantastical, smooth, life-lusting innocence of high-spirited revolt. Rather than trafficking in any sort of nostalgia for the musical language of bygone but recent times, it transports with its simplicity: Ooh-ooh-ooh / Hello hello / Ooh-ooh-ooh / Hello hello / I’m feeling alive again / Alive again. Head First feels less like a maelstrom of references (hi, Lady Gaga) than the triumph of a gruelingly specific, sharply honed sensibility of pop-song craft—lived-in, comfortable, so simple, so familiar, and yet so unexpected as to be surprisingly sublime.  

7. Olivia Newton-John, Olivia Newton-John, Olivia Newton-John.

8. “I Wanna Life”: So titled, it has the peculiar effect of creating a verb of “life.” Appropriate for an album so vivacious, so defiant in its obedience to impeccable pop composition. An unselfconscious embrace of what could have been tacky, cold, and fraught with shrill synthesizers, but instead became luscious, warm, captivating in earnest, intimate in its offering up of a pleasure that need not be second-guessed. I wanna life.

9. ELO’s “The Fall.”

10. The final track, a drifty number buoyed by overlayed, staccato samples of Allison Goldfrapp’s voice doing different things—it’s called “Voicething,” for God’s sake—while striking me as the most patently ridiculous song of all, also enchants with its simplicity. In its sheer commitment to artifice, it swirls, hums, and completes itself in a Mozart-like transport of unhurried bliss. Delicious!   

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate