What Did the FBI Know About Faisal Shahzad?

A report that the feds were asking questions about the alleged Times Square bomber six years ago poses a major mystery.

Personal Photo / <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/2300-504083_162-10003326-2.html?tag=page;next">CBS News</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


There was really nothing memorable about the 24-year-old Pakistani guy whom George LaMonica bought his Norwalk, Connecticut, condo from in the spring of 2004. Had it not been for what happened shortly after he moved in, LaMonica might have forgotten him entirely. LaMonica says he arrived home one day to find the business card of a detective working with an FBI-led task force. When he later spoke to the investigator, he says, he was asked about the condo’s previous owner. The potential significance of this only became apparent years later, when the man in question, Faisal Shahzad, was arrested for the failed plot to detonate a car bomb in New York’s Times Square.

LaMonica’s account, if accurate, raises some crucial questions: Why were the feds sniffing around Shahzad six years ago? Did they have suspicions about him that should have been acted upon before he parked a bomb-laden Pathfinder in the heart of New York City? As in the Fort Hood shooting and the bungled Christmas Day bombing, did government agencies possess pieces of the puzzle, yet fail to grasp the big picture?

According to CBS, from 1999 to 2008 Shahzad’s name appeared on a government immigration watch list known as the Traveler Enforcement Compliance System after he brought “approximately $80,000 cash or cash instruments” into the US. It’s unclear if this is related to the inquiry LaMonica describes, which remains a major mystery—all the more so because the FBI maintains it has no record of interviewing LaMonica. Further, spokesman Paul Bresson denied that any investigation involving Shahzad took place in that timeframe.

Since Shahzad’s arrest, LaMonica, a 35-year-old computer consultant, has been besieged by reporters digging for information on the suspected terrorist’s background. Not that LaMonica has much to add. “I’ll tell you the same thing I’ve told the hundreds of other reporters,” he responded when I contacted him via Facebook. “I met him at the closing just long enough to get writer’s cramp while signing the mountain of legal documents,” LaMonica wrote. “He was just a normal young guy. He dressed in a polo or button-down, and there was really nothing ‘off’ about him.”

“The only item of interest,” he went on, was the fact that an FBI task-force investigator contacted him. “He basically asked all the questions you guys have been,” LaMonica said. “It really didn’t seem like it was anything other than a routine investigation.”

Based on LaMonica’s description, the detective he says he spoke with was likely a Connecticut state trooper detailed to a Joint Terrorism Task Force. Coordinated from the headquarters of the National Counterterrorism Center in Northern Virginia, JTTFs operate in more than 100 cities around the country, composed of personnel from a variety of federal, state, and local law-enforcement agencies. Over the years, JTTF units have spearheaded high-profile terrorism investigations, including those that led to the arrests of the Lackawanna Six and the Portland Seven, as well as the thwarting of the 2007 Fort Dix plot. It was members of a New York-based task force that apprehended Faisal Shahzad last Monday as he tried to flee the country.

LaMonica’s recollection of speaking with a detective about Shahzad was first reported by the New York Times last week; it was buried eleven paragraphs deep in a profile of the alleged terrorist. Outside of a handful of blogs (most of them conservative-leaning) and a single question referencing the Times story at Wednesday’s White House press briefing, this intriguing revelation has received almost no attention. (Press secretary Robert Gibbs said he had “not seen” the New York Times report.) Along with the CBS story, LaMonica’s account suggests that Shahzad, for one reason or another, was on the radar of federal authorities years before the attempted bombing.

That said, no evidence has surfaced yet to indicate that Shahzad had become radicalized back in 2004. Reports suggest that his extremist worldview only manifested itself fairly recently. “As far as I’m concerned, this is not the person I knew six years ago,” Kevin Courbois, Shahzad’s real estate agent on the condo sale to LaMonica, told me. He said that authorities never made any attempt to contact him about Shahzad, and he’s puzzled why anyone would question LaMonica. Mostly, though, he’s baffled by Shahzad’s apparent transformation from a mild-mannered and hard-working young man into a suspected terrorist with alleged ties to the Pakistani Taliban. The Faisal Shahzad he remembers was “a very genuine, nice person” who once offered to host Courbois, an avid traveler, if he ever made it to Pakistan. “You come and you stay with my family,” Shahzad told his realtor. “We’ll treat you right.”

After the FBI’s Bresson told me the bureau had no record of speaking with LaMonica, I contacted the Connecticut State Police, where a spokesman told me that his office would have no knowledge of people interviewed by the JTTF, since task force personnel are under the bureau’s authority. Eventually I was put in touch with FBI agent William Reiner, a spokesman for the FBI’s New Haven field office, where Connecticut’s JTTF is based. When I described LaMonica’s account, he responded, “That’s news to me. If it happened in 2004, we were running out some kind of lead. But I think there could be a slight mix up here.” He promised to look into it.

A few hours passed, and I phoned him back for an update. But Reiner’s response shed no light on the mystery. He had only this to say: “We’re not going to comment on any investigative info whatsoever.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate