GOP, Tea Party Part Ways Over Pork

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


On Wednesday, House Republicans launched America Speaking Out, a new attempt to create an agenda for congressional candidates running for reelection in the fall. Spearheaded by House Minority Leader John Boehner, the website was designed to solicit input from the public as to what the party’s priorities ought to be.

The idea isn’t exactly new. Months ago, Tea Party activists essentially did the same thing and came up with their own “Contract From America,” modeled after the Contract With America that helped the GOP gain control of Congress in 1994. The Tea Partiers received feedback from nearly half a million people, who voted on the top ten ideas submitted by individuals to the site. The results were released to great fanfare on April 15 at a big Tax Day Tea Party at the Washington Monument.

Since then, the Tea Partiers have been trying to get members of Congress to sign the thing, which includes standard-fare GOP material, such as calls for a balanced budget, lower taxes, and rejecting cap and trade climate legislation. Republican officials have been openly supportive of the contract, lavishing praise on the Tea Partiers for drafting it. Boehner himself even called it “required reading” for conservative politicians. But then he refused to sign.

While signing the contract might seem like a no-brainer for most Republican lawmakers, especially those seeking to win favor with the discontented grassroots, the Tea Partiers have only secured the signatures of five members: Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa), Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC), Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), and Reps. Michael McCaul and Pete Olson, Republicans from Texas.

Other GOP legislators have said that they were loath to sign it when their party was cooking up its own crowd-sourcing agenda. But looking at the new GOP site, it seems clear that the official Republican venture is mostly a do-over of the Tea Party project. You might wonder why the Republicans bothered spending money to reinvent the wheel. One answer may lie in one item on the Tea Party platform. The document calls for a ban on earmarks, the much-loathed tool used by members of Congress to direct money to pet projects in their districts and states. Republican Tim Burns, who was running in a special election to fill the seat of the late Pennsylvania Rep. John Murtha, explicitly told the Tea Party activists that while he supported the Contract in theory, signing an anti-pork pledge in that district would be the end of his candidacy. (He lost anyway.) Another member who shall remain nameless actually crossed out the anti-pork pledge and then signed the Contract, according to a Contract organizer.

One leading Tea Party activist suspects that there’s no way Boehner and company will come up with a new version of the Contract With America that calls for a ban on pork, no matter how many people recommend it on their new website. Robin Stublen, a Florida Tea Party leader who has been one of the most outspoken critics of the GOP’s effort, notes that Republicans have changed the name of their enterprise. When GOP leaders first announced what they were up to, they were promising to create a new “Commitment to America.” But that name has been replaced by America Speaking Out. “I’ll tell you why they changed it. Because they can’t keep a commitment,” says Stublen, who is furious with Boehner. “If he’d been listening, he’d a signed the Contract [from America]. It’s the epitome of arrogance.”

The primary organizers behind the Tea Party contract, though, have offered a more conciliatory response to the GOP’s new project. The Tea Party activists have already submitted all of the ideas in their Contract to the GOP’S America Speaking Out website, and they were calling on supporters to vote on these proposals. A note on the Contract website says:

We are thrilled that GOP leaders in Washington have heard that call and are taking steps to re-engage with the American people. Yes, the Contract from America initiative has already been listening to Americans since last year. We have debated thousands of ideas. We have logged hundreds of thousands of votes. But far more important is the role we will continue to play, however large or small, in helping build strong coalitions of like-minded Americans that will work together to restore and rebuild this great nation.

Ryan Hecker, a Houston Tea Party leader and the brains behind the Contract, says he’s quite happy that the GOP has embraced so much of the Tea Party idea. He doesn’t see the GOP’s new initiative as a competing effort. “It would be great if the RNC and the Democratic Party supported the effort entirely. I have no problem with this becoming mainstream,” he says. He adds that the success of the Tea Party contract has exceeded his wildest expectations: “I’m very honored that Sen. Coburn, who didn’t sign the 1994 Contract [With America] signed ours. It’s good that [Republican politicians] are starting to listen.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate