Can Financial Reform Save Harry Reid?

The Senate majority leader is struggling to win re-election. Passage of Wall Street reform could be his big break.

Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid. Article photo by Lauren Victoria Burke/WDCPIX.COM. Front page photo by EPA/ZUMApress.com

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Last week’s passage in the Senate of a historic and comprehensive financial reform bill clinched a personal victory for Senate majority leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.). And Reid is a man in need of big wins. He’s facing double-digit deficits in midterm election polling and an anti-incumbent mood sweeping the country. Will financial reform give Reid the boost he needs to defeat his Republican opponent?

The Nevada senator‘s poll numbers in his 2010 reelection bid have been sagging for months. After expending massive amounts of political capital on a health care bill that’s deeply unpopular in his home state, Reid is trailing all of his Republican challengers. An April 27 Rasmussen poll put his leading opponent, former Nevada GOP chairwoman Sue Lowden, ahead by 13 percentage points, an advantage Lowden has more or less maintained since the beginning of the year. Reid trails two other Republicans, Danny Tarkanian and Sharron Angle, by between eight to 10 points in the polls as well. So bad was his standing in Nevada earlier this year that he had to reassure voters he was still running for reelection.

The Senate’s financial reform battle gave Reid an ideal opportunity to fight back from the brink. His top Democratic counterpart, Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), who’s retiring this year, did much of the party’s back-room dealing and absorbed most of the Democratic-directed criticism. That left Reid, a former amateur boxer, to bash his two favorite punching bags—Republicans and big banks.

Reid forced Republicans to drag their opposition to the bill into public every chance he got. He hasn’t often used the tactic of forcing Republicans to actually filibuster legislation, but, knowing that the Democrats’ image could only improve, he consistently did so during the financial reform debate. When the GOP repeatedly filibustered the reform bill, he deemed them “anti-American.” His office called out Republicans for visiting top hedge-fund managers in the middle of writing the finance bill. The barrage of rhetorical jabs culminated in early May when, steaming over Republicans’ filibustering tactics to block the start of the floor debate on financial reform, Reid said, “The Republicans are having difficulty determining how they’re going to continue making love to Wall Street.” (Reid spokesman Jim Manley rubbed salt in the wound, saying soon after, “What can I say? It’s true. Republicans are making love to Wall Street while Main Street is getting screwed.”)

Given his state’s abysmal economic condition, Reid couldn’t ask for a better bill to tout on the campaign trail, experts say. In Nevada, unemployment is 13.7 percent, second only to Michigan among all 50 states. In 2009, Nevada’s foreclosure rate—one foreclosure filing for every ten houses, or 112,000 filings overall—was the highest in the US, according to RealtyTrac. Railing against big banks and the politicians in the banks’ pockets is a no-lose strategy, says Eric Herzik, chair of the University of Nevada-Reno’s political science department. “This is one area where he can say as part of his campaign, ‘Harry Reid is standing up for Nevada and standing up against the big banks,'” Herzik says. “That’s not a bad line to have in Nevada.”

That message, Herzik says, will be especially important as Reid tries to win over Nevada’s centrist voters, the key bloc in his reelection bid. The way Herzik sees it, Reid has a loyal base of voters, and another bloc of voters—about 40 percent of the state—who’ll always vote against him. Winning this fall will mean winning over the remaining voters in the middle—a task made easier by passing the Senate’s Wall Street overhaul. “If he can hold his base and start wooing back those centrists, the people who’re driving his negatives, then he wins,” Herzik says. “Particularly on an item like financial reform, he’s in a very good position.”

Even though the midterm elections are just over five months away, Reid won’t have any problems reminding Nevadans that he fought Wall Street and won, says David Damore, a political science professor at the University of Nevada-Las Vegas. Damore points to Reid’s fundraising prowess—he has raised $16.8 million so far for the 2010 election, nearly eight times more than Lowden, his closest competitor, and more than every other candidate combined—and concludes that Reid won’t have any trouble advertising his role in passing the bill. “He’s going to have a lot of money to remind people about that,” Damore says.

A spokeswoman for Reid said the senator would indeed use the passage of financial reform to separate himself from Lowden and other Republican candidates. “This is an important distinction between Senator Reid and Republican senate candidates Sharron Angle, Danny Tarkanian, and Sue Lowden, who not only oppose Wall Street reform but advocate returning to the same economic policies of the Bush Administration that got us into this mess,” the spokeswoman, Regan Lachapelle, wrote in an email.

Ultimately, Herzik and Damore both predict success this fall for Reid, regardless of who he faces in the general election. Notable gaffes by Sue Lowden—she suggested offering chickens to physicians as payment for health care, and was recently accused of breaking campaign laws by accepting a donor’s luxury RV to travel the state—have boosted Reid’s prospects. And the rise of dark-horse GOP candidate—and Tea Party darling—Sharron Angle, who could steal votes from Lowden, benefits Reid as well, Herzik says. Combine these developments with Reid’s populist campaigning, reinvigorated by the finance bill’s passage, and the political climate looks a lot rosier for the majority leader than it did earlier this year. “Reid can say, ‘We’re fixing the excesses of Wall Street,’ which are a problem—and Reid’s on the right side of that,” Herzik says. “I don’t see how the Republicans can go after him on this.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate