A Good Night for Liberals

Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.) and his son, Rand (left). | Flickr/<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/gageskidmore/4318291874/">Gage Skidmore</a> (<a href="http://www.creativecommons.org">Creative Commons</a>)

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Tuesday was a big day for American politics. You’ll be hearing a lot about the victories for the tea party, but liberal Democrats also did as well as—and perhaps better than—the right-wing insurgents. In some cases—like that of Rand Paul’s win in Kentucky’s Republican Senate primary—tea partiers and liberals were even celebrating the same event. Tea partiers preferred Paul, the son of Texas congressman Ron Paul, to Trey Grayson, the establishment GOP candidate. But liberals were also rooting for Paul, because polling shows that he could be easier to beat in the general election than Grayson would have been.

Liberals had to be happy with some of Tuesday’s other results, too. In Pennsylvania, GOPer-turned-Dem Arlen Specter lost the Democratic primary to Rep. Joe Sestak. In Arkansas, Sen. Blanche Lincoln was not able to avoid a June 8 runoff with union and liberal-backed Lt. Gov. Bill Halter. And in Kentucky, Attorney General Jack Conway—generally considered to be not only more progressive but also a stronger general election candidate than Lt. Gov. Dan Mongiardo—won his primary. Conway will face Rand Paul in November, and stands a decent chance of winning.

Another important win for progressives was in Pennsylvania’s 6th congressional district, where physician Manan Trivedi edged newspaper publisher Doug Pike. Trivedi was a big favorite of the netroots and a member of Daily Kos’ “Orange to Blue” program. He’ll take on incumbent GOPer Jim Gerlach in November.

Tuesday’s big victory for the national Democratic party, however, isn’t as pleasant for liberals. Mark Critz held Pennsylvania’s 12th congressional district for the Dems, filling the seat once held by the late Rep. John Murtha. But Critz is not a progressive—he ran against health care reform and tried to distance himself from President Obama, who has a 33 percent approval rating in the district. Still, Critz is more liberal than the alternative, GOPer Tim Burns. Progressives will take a Democrat who will vote with them some of the time over a Republican who would vote against them on almost everything.

Will liberal wins in May primaries lead to defeats in November? Maybe in some cases, but these aren’t them. Conway and Sestak poll better against their GOP opponents than their less progressive primary opponents did. Trivedi-Pike is a wash. And either Halter or Lincoln is probably cooked in the Arkansas general election against popular GOP Rep. John Boozman. The national Democratic establishment might not be happy about seeing some of their preferred candidates go down, but if anything, Tuesday’s results will help the Dems in November.

Here’s a roundup of some of the other important primary results, including updates on the rest of my 14 House races to watch:

PA-GOV: Allegheny County Executive Dan Onorato (D) and AG Tom Corbett (R) won their primaries handily.

OR-GOV: Ex-Gov John Kitzhaber easily won the Dem primary and will seek a third (non-consecutive) term in November. He’ll face Chris Dudley, a former professional basketball player.

AR-01: Rick Crawford won the GOP primary for the race to replace retiring Rep. Marion Berry. On the Dem side, Berry’s former chief of staff Chad Causey and prosecutor Tim Woolridge will compete in a June 8 runoff, since neither came close to 50 percent.

AR-02: Tim Griffin, a Karl Rove protege who is connected to the US Attorneys scandal, won his primary handily and will await the winner of a Dem runoff between state Sen. Joyce Elliott and state House Speaker Robbie Wills. David Boling, the chief of staff to retiring Rep. Vic Snyder, is out of the running.

PA-03 (GOP): Car dealer Mike Kelly will take on Dem Rep. Kathy Dahlkemper, who could be vulnerable in the fall. Kelly won less than 30 percent of the primary vote against five other candidates. A former city councilman, he was the only Republican in the primary who had held elected office before.

PA-04 (GOP): It turns out that ex-US Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan was badly damaged by her association with Bush-era controversies. Attorney Keith Rothfus crushed her and will face sophomore Dem Rep. Jason Altmire in November. Buchanan’s defeat means a lot of egg on the face for national Republicans—the National Republican Congressional Committee backed her.

PA-07: It will be State Rep. Bryan Lentz (D), an Iraq war vet vs. Pat Meehan (R), another former US Attorney, in the contest for this suburban Philadelphia seat. Joe Sestak used to hold it, but he’s the Democrat’s Senate nominee now, remember?

PA-08 (GOP): It’s a rematch! Former GOP Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick will try to get his job back from Dem Rep. Patrick Murphy, who took it from him in 2006. This one should be great to follow. “Even before the results were in, Murphy—now the incumbent—fired off a letter to Fitzpatrick challenging him to eight debates during the election season. Fitzpatrick shot back saying that eight isn’t enough, and he wants to start the dialogue as soon as next week,” KYW Newsradio reports.

PA-10 (GOP): Tom Marino, yet another ex-US Attorney-turned-Republican recruit, won his primary, and will face incumbent Dem Chris Carney in the fall. But two opponents garnered 58 percent of the vote, and the primary cost Marino a lot of money. National Journal says that he’ll “be nearly broke for the general, while Carney is sitting on $700K in the bank.”

PA-11 (DEM): Incumbent Rep. Paul Kanjorski fought off a primary challenge. Now he’ll face a third matchup with 2002 and 2008 rival Lou Barletta, the mayor of Hazleton.

PA-17 (GOP): Rep. Tim Holden could be vulnerable, but State Sen. Dave Argall, the Republican nominee, only barely fended off a Tea Party challenge in his primary. Holden has nearly a million dollars to fend off a challenge and voted against health care reform and cap-and-trade.

KY-04 (GOP): Tea Party candidate Todd Lally won the primary and will take on Dem Rep. John Yarmuth in the fall. The NRCC backed someone else.

KY-06 (GOP): Garland “Andy” Barr will get a shot at taking out three-term Blue Dog Dem Ben Chandler. But Chandler voted against health care reform and has a massive war chest—nearly $1.7 million. That’s a lot of money anywhere, but it will go an especially long way in Kentucky’s media markets.

OR-01 (GOP), OR-05 (GOP): Two members of the NRCC’s “young guns” program (read: candidates anointed by national Republicans) won their respective primaries in the two Oregon districts most likely to be competitive come November. Consultant Rob Cornilles will face District 1 Rep. David Wu, who’s been in Congress since 1998. In the fifth district, Rep. Kurt Schrader will have to fend off state Rep. Scott Bruun. Both GOPers faced Tea Party challenges but won anyway.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate