Watch Al-Jazeera’s Video From the Gaza Ship Raid

<a href="http://www.cnas.org/blogs/abumuqawama/2010/06/fast-roping-101.html">Andrew Exum/Abu Muqawama</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Adding to the already-considerable fount of video and oral evidence from Monday’s Israeli flotilla raid, Al Jazeera English today interviewed its own reporter, who had been shooting footage on the weatherdeck of the cargo ship Mavi Marmara and was subsequently detained until this morning. That producer, Jamal ElShayyal, told a story that—if true—depicts criminal (or, at least, criminally stupid) behavior by the Israeli boarding party:

Of course, the source always has to be considered. But AJE manages to get where many media outlets can’t or won’t, and the video, which intersperses ElShayyal’s own standup reports from the ship deck, offers some support for the shipboard protesters’ allegations against the Israel Defense Forces.

ElShayyal claims that Israeli forces first deployed flash-bang grenades and tear gas. Then, about five minutes later, the live fire began.

“There was definitely fire from the air because one of the individuals who was killed was clearly shot from above,” he says. “There was also fire coming from the sea as well.”

He didn’t seem to think that live fire was ordered, as the IDF claimed, after two of its own soldiers were overpowered and their sidearms taken. “There’s no doubt from what I saw that live ammunition was fired before any Israeli soldier was on deck,” ElShayyal says:

After I had done my first file, I turned around to see what was going on, and there were several shots fired. In fact, one of the helicopters at the front of the ship, you could almost see the soldiers pointing their guns down through some sort of hole or compartment at the bottom side of the helicopter and firing almost indiscriminately without even looking where they were firing. And those bullets were definitely live bullets.

ElShayyal adds that after he watched two people on the deck shot and killed, he witnessed a confrontation between the Israeli boarding party and protesters below decks, where three wounded individuals were being sheltered:

There was a Knesset member who approached the Israeli soldiers saying, ‘We have injured”-she was saying, “They have injured people, please come and take them,” yet the Israelis refused. Three hours later, all three of those people that were injured ended up dying on the spot because no one came to take them.”

To be fair, ElShayyal stresses that he saw brutality on all sides: “I definitely saw iron bars,” he says. “The passengers took apart some of the railing bars on the ships…I did see a number of the Israeli soldiers being beaten by them.”

But no matter. All of this potentially adds up to some big Israeli violations of international conventions of war—and probably IDF military regulations, too. At the very least, it’s safe to say that the Israeli combat elements need remediation in counterinsurgent and naval boarding tactics—something that experts like The New Yorker‘s George Packer and Afghanistan veteran Andrew Exum at Abu Muqawama have already said in eloquent terms. As Packer says:

At one time, Israelis understood counterinsurgency much better than Americans, which is why U.S. officers looked to their Israeli counterparts for advice in the early years of the Iraq war. At one time, the Israelis understood that self-interest demanded subtlety, restraint, and attention to perception. As others have pointed out, these qualities have been disappearing from Israeli strategy and tactics, and the current right-wing government seems determined to isolate and destroy itself with the unbending principle of self-defense.

Exum puts his critique in far more trenchant—and visual—terms, in a post titled “Fast-Roping 101“:

For the record, the IDF’s apparent stupidity extended beyond the initial engagement to the detention of the protesters and journalists. AJE’s anchor asked ElShayyal how he was treated the past three days.

“To be honest, I think maybe ‘with contempt’ is probably the most polite” way of putting it, he said.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate