BP’s Favorite Politicians, By the Numbers

<a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:20_Dollars_art3.jpg">Wikimedia Commons</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Who’s BP’s favorite politician ever? If you’re just going by the numbers, it’s none other than President Barack Obama, who leads BP’s lifetime campaign donation list with $77,051. That puts him just ahead of reliable oilmen such as Alaska Republican Rep. Don Young, his retired colleague Sen. Ted Stevens, and George W. Bush. According to data collected by the Center for Responsive Politics, BP and its employees have given more than $3.4 million to federal candidates since 1990, with much of their largesse going to these 20:

Candidate
Amount Received from BP
President Barack Obama
$77,051
Rep. Don Young (R-Alaska)
$73,300
Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska, ret.)
$53,200
President George W Bush $47,388
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) $44,899
Sen. George Voinovich (R-Ohio) $41,400
Sen. Mike DeWine (R-Ohio, ret.) $37,550
Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.) $31,000
Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) $28,200
Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas) $27,350
Sen. Daniel Coats (R-Ind., ret.) $25,000
Rep. Lynn Martin (R-Ill., ret.) $24,450
Sen. Frank Murkowski (R-Alaska) $24,000
Sen. Phil Gramm (R-Texas) $23,800
Sen. Don Nickles (R-Okla., ret.) $23,750
Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.) $22,300
Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) $22,000
Rep. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) $21,100
Rep. John Culberson (R-Texas) $20,950
Sen. Pete Domenici (R-N.M.) $20,800

 

Obama’s $77K from BP is 0.01% of the whopping $799 million he’s raised in his career, but as everything BP touches turns toxic, it raises a question: Would he—should he—give BP its money back? OpenSecrets asked BP’s #9 all-time recipient, Louisiana Senator Mary Landrieu, the same thing shortly after the spill, and her flack answered that gifts from BP and its employees “have absolutely no impact on Sen. Landrieu’s policy agenda or her response to this unprecedented disaster in the Gulf.” So far, no other officeholders have volunteered to refund their past donations from the company to pay its cleanup (or legal) bill.

Meanwhile, BP and its employees have spent more than $112,000 on 70 candidates running in the 2010 election cycle, with 56% going to Republicans and more than 70% going to incumbents. However, the top recipient so far is a Democratic newbie, Kentucky Senate candidate Jack Conway, who’s received $9,600 from BP employees for his campaign against Rand Paul. Here’s BP’s top 15 recipients as of mid-May (see here for a more detailed breakdown):

Candidate
Amount Received from BP
Jack Conway (D-Ky., Senate) $9,600
Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) $7,000
Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) $4,000
Jeffrey M. Landry (R-La., House) $2,400
Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) $2,000
Rep. John Culberson (R-Texas) $2,000
Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.) $2,000
Rep. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) $2,000
Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) $2,000
Rep. John Shimkus (R-Ill.) $2,000
Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.) $2,000
Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas) $1,500
Julie Hamos (D-Ill., House) $1,400
Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) $1,250
Cheryle Robinson Jackson (D-Ill., Senate) $1,050

(italics=incumbent)

Several of the incumbents on that list are members of congressional energy committees; Murkowski is a ranking member of the Senate’s. Overall, BP donations have gone to 14 members of the House Energy Committee, 10 members of the House Natural Resources Committee, and 7 members of the Senate Energy Committee. Among the non-incumbents on the list is Jeffrey Landry, a Republican House candidate from Louisiana who has attacked the Obama administration’s recent ban on deepwater drilling in the Gulf, telling Human Events, “When he takes the…Outer Continental Shelf drilling away from us, he cripples our economy. If he increases the moratorium, he pulls the plug on our life support.” Landry’s probably not the one to do it, but seems like only a matter of time before a candidate makes a big show of sending a fat check back to BP.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate