Kagan Hearings: The GOP’s Plan of Attack

Republicans intend to make an issue of the Supreme Court nominee’s gay rights track record. The only wildcard is which GOP senator will come right out and ask her if she’s a lesbian.

Michael Reynolds/zumapress.com

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


EDITOR’S NOTE: For more on Kagan’s confirmation hearings check out Stephanie Mencimer’s live Twitter coverage.

Remember Elena Kagan? Monday kicks off her confirmation hearings to be President Obama’s second nominee to the Supreme Court in as many years. In part because of a crush of other news—BP, McChrystal, etc.—Kagan’s nomination has not proved to be much of a story lately. Despite poring over 160,000 pages of documents related to her government service, Republicans have turned up precious little to give her Senate grilling much dramatic potential. One of the more controversial items in the Kagan file is the fact that she helped shepherd that raging radical Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg through her confirmation process. (Lest we forget, Ginsburg once advocated public funding for abortion, a constitutional right to prostitution, co-ed prisons, and abolishing Mother’s Day, if you can believe it.)

Unlike last summer’s hearings for Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Kagan is not saddled with controversial rulings like the Connecticut firefighters case. Training for the job since high school, she has uttered no “wise Latina” quotes for the Senate Judiciary Committee members to condemn. Most of Kagan’s confirmation hearings probably won’t be about her at all, but rather a partisan debate over whether the current Supreme Court has been overreaching. In short, it’s not likely to produce many candid moments from the nominee. The only real wildcard question hanging over the proceedings might be: Will Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) ask Kagan if she’s a lesbian?

While Eliot Spitzer seemed to settle the question that dogged Kagan immediately after her nomination, when he said that he knew guys who had dated her in college, there are plenty of evangelical Christians out there who are not convinced that Obama isn’t secretly plotting to name a gay justice as an agent of the homosexual agenda. (Or possibly an “ex-gay”: Last week, the president of Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays and Gays, issued a statement suggesting that maybe Kagan isn’t gay now, but she might have been before Obama nominated her. The group urged her to come out publicly as an “ex-gay.”) The anti-gay group MassResistance is threatening to release another “damning” report on Kagan’s gay activism on Monday, one they’ve been working hard on with Peter LaBarbara, head of Americans for Truth About Homosexuality.

Given the evangelical opposition to Kagan’s nomination, it’s not inconceivable that Coburn or another GOP senator will just come out and ask her if she’s a lesbian under the guise of setting the record straight and as a bone to some of their constituents. After all, it’s clear from the list of witnesses they’ve assembled that the GOP intends to make gay rights the centerpiece of its opposition to Kagan. The GOP’s plans to introduce a host of military types, who will presumably discuss Kagan’s alleged hostility to the armed forces and the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, stemming from her days as dean of Harvard law School, when she barred military recruiters from meeting with students in the school’s office of career services. They’ve also got Tony Perkins in the queue, the head of the anti-gay Family Research Council, who in late May wrote an op-ed in the Washington Times bashing Kagan for joining other law professors in a legal brief opposing the Solomon Amendment as unconstitutional discrimination against gays and lesbians. Perkins wrote:

To recognize any distinction whatsoever—to “discriminate”—between the only type of sexual relationship that can reproduce the human race and a non-procreative type of relationship that has given us an epidemic of sexually transmitted diseases is “not just”? I would argue that failing to make such a distinction is not realistic, not honest and not credible.

And as a sign of just how desperate the minority party is to find anyone to testify that Kagan really isn’t qualified to join the court, the GOP initially invited retired US Army Lt. Gen. William “Jerry” Boykin to weigh in on her treatment of the military at Harvard Law School. In 2002, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld tapped Boykin to serve as Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence, where he was charged with heading the military’s search for Osama bin Laden and other terrorist leaders. The following year, news leaked that Boykin had been spending a lot of his free time preaching in fundamentalist churches around the country about the Christian holy war on Islam.

Once, in an Oklahoma Baptist church, Boykin showed the congregation a series of photos he had taken in Somalia shortly after the famous 1993 Black Hawk Down incident, which resulted in the deaths of more than a dozen Americans. He claimed that a dark shadow that appeared in one of his photos across the top of Mogadishu was not a film processing fluke but rather the “principalities of darkness… It is a demonic presence in that city that God revealed to me as the enemy.” Such commentary led to an internal investigation and the military reprimanded Boykin for speaking out of school without permission. He finally retired in 2007 and ever since has been a regular on the fringe-right talk circuit, joining such luminaries as LaBarbera and the Traditional Values Coalition’s Lou Sheldon to talk about the culture wars.

Boykin’s presence on the GOP witness list lasted but a few hours. Once word got out Friday about his dubious credentials, the GOP promptly disinvited him, according to The Hill.

It’s too bad, because his departure leaves most of the hearing’s entertainment prospects to the likes of Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), the judiciary committee’s ranking member, and of course, Coburn. A favorite of the religious right and a longtime foot-soldier against the “gay agenda,” Coburn once warned his fellow Republicans that “the gay community has infiltrated the very centers of power in every area across this country, and they wield extreme power. [The gay] agenda is the greatest threat to our freedom that we face today.” During his 2004 Senate campaign, Coburn claimed that lesbianism is “so rampant in some of the schools in southeast Oklahoma that they’ll only let one girl go to the bathroom.”

Coburn, an ob/gyn, is also not squeamish about addressing issues bluntly. In his early years on the Hill, he used to order pizza and offer STD classes to interns and staffers, complete with graphic slides. During the confirmation hearings for Sonia Sotomayor last summer, he famously quipped that the nominee “had some ‘splaining to do,” channeling Ricky Ricardo. Coburn won’t lose any votes by asking Kagan how she feels about Ellen DeGeneres. But then again, he probably knows better. Oh well. At least we’ll have Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) to liven things up.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate