Wall St. Reform’s Final Bout, Revolving Door Edition

WDCPIX.COM/Lauren Victoria Burke

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The fate of Congress’ massive financial reform overhaul now rests in the hands of a few select lawmakers—top Democrats and Republicans from the House and Senate. Starting Thursday, this small group has two weeks or so to merge 3,000 pages of dense, overlapping legislative text into a single bill to deliver to President Obama.

These same lawmakers also happen to be among the most well-connected to Wall Street, big banks, and their lobbyists in Washington—that is, the very industries they’re seeking to regulate. A review by Mother Jones of lobbying records shows there are 70 current or former financial lobbyists who’ve previously worked in the Capitol Hill offices of these lawmakers. The lawmakers participating in the conference process with the most Hill staffers-turned-finance-lobbyists include Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), the banking committee chairman; Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.), banking committee’s ranking member; and Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY), a longtime ally of Wall Street.

The close ties between the financial reform conferees and finance lobbyists are a stark reminder of how much clout Wall Street has here in Washington, and how ingrained the big banks are in the legislative process. A recent report (pdf) by the Public Accountability Initiative, titled “Big Bank Takeover,” put it this way: “The big banks have employed an unrivaled network of in-house lobbying teams, hired guns, industry associations, front groups, and behind-the-scenes influence peddlers with deep connections to Congress and the Obama administration, including the leadership of the House financial services committee, the Senate banking committee, the Treasury Department, and key regulatory agencies.”

31 House members (10 of those will only participate on select parts of the bill) and 12 Senators will be participating in the financial reform conference debates, led by the House and Senate’s respective stewards of financial reform in 2009 and 2010: Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), chairman of the financial services committee, and Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), chairman of the banking committee. 

Here’s a list of the House and Senate conferees and the number of former staffers they have who once lobbied or continue to lobby for the finance, insurance, and real estate, or FIRE, sector. All data comes from the Center for Responsive Politics’ revolving door database.

Among the Senate conferees, there are 44 former staffers with FIRE sector lobbying ties—or nearly four for each Senate conferee:

Chris Dodd (D-Conn.): 6
Richard Shelby (R-Ala.): 9
Tim Johnson (D-ND): 2
Charles Schumer (D-NY): 7
Jack Reed (D-RI): 3
Bob Corker (R-Tenn.): 1
Mike Crapo (R-Id.): 4
Judd Gregg (R-NH): 2
Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.): 5
Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.): 1
Pat Leahy (D-Vt.): 4
Tom Harkin (D-Ia.): 0

On the House side, there are 26 former staffers with FIRE ties:

Barney Frank (D-Mass.): 2
Paul Kanjorski (D-Pa.): 2
Maxine Waters (D-Calif.): 1
Carolyn Maloney (D-NY): 2
Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) 0
Mel Watt (D-NC): 1
Gregory Meeks (D-NY): 2
Dennis Moore (D-Kan.): 1
Mary Jo Kilroy (D-Ohio): 0
Gary Peters (D-Mich): 0
Collin Peterson (D-Minn.): 0
Leonard Boswell (D-Iowa): 1
Henry Waxman (D-Calif.): 1
Bobby Rush (D-Ill.): 1
John Conyers (D-Mich.): 1
Howard Berman (D-Calif.): 1
Edolphus Towns (D-NY): 2
Elijah Cummings (D-Md.): 1
Nydia Velazquez (D-NY): 0
Heath Shuler (D-NC): 0
Spencer Bachus (R-Ala.): 1
Joe Barton (R-Tx.): 1
Sam Graves (R-Mo.): 1
Darrell Issa (R-Calif.): 2
Frank Lucas (R-Okla.): 0
Lamar Smith (R-Tx.): 3
Ed Royce (R-Calif.): 0
Judy Biggert (R-Ill.): 0
Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV): 0
Jeb Hensarling (R-Tx.): 0
Scott Garrett (R-NJ): 0

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate