America’s Top Mediator Heads to the Gulf

Photo by talkradionews, <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/talkradionews/4835308130/">via Flickr</a>.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Somewhere along the line, Kenneth Feinberg became the go-to mediator for the country. Most recently, he took a turn as executive pay czar, tapped by the Obama administration to oversee the compensation of executives at companies which received federal bailout money. He’s officially done with that job at the end of this month. Then, he’ll move into the job of Gulf oil fund czar full time, a role in which he’ll be charged with making sure those hurt by the spill are properly compensated.

Add these two roles to an already lengthy list of high-profile mediations. After serving as special master of the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund, dispensing $7 billion to the more than 5,000 survivors and relatives of those lost in those attacks, Feinberg administrated the fund established in the wake of the April 2007 Virginia Tech shootings. In June, he was called in to help mediate disputes with Maricopa County, Ariz.’s infamous Sheriff Joe Arpaio. All of this leads to an obvious question: Why him?

“I think there are millions of Americans that, if asked, could do just what I’m doing,” Feinberg told an audience at Public Citizen on Tuesday, in one of his first public appearances since he was tapped as spill czar. He acknowledged that tackling touchy issues is a tough job. “I have experience. I think that’s what people look to: Experience dealing with mass claims involving not only substance, but the emotion of people you’re dealing with,” he said.

He’ll be handling claims with plenty of both when he moves his focus to the Gulf spill on August 1. BP has yet to make the first payment into what will be a $20 billion escrow fund that Feinberg is tasked with doling out. The company is supposed to set aside $5 billion a year for the next four years for the fund. Getting that up and running can’t happen fast enough, as BP is already facing allegations of cutting spill victims off from much-needed funds.

Feinberg has already been busy making stops around the Gulf region in hopes of winning over residents who worry that the fund might yield less compensation than lawsuits against BP. He acknowledges that the job ahead of him is difficult, and possibly more complicated than other cases he’s mediated where the liability has been more clear. In the Gulf, he’ll have to deal with a litany of unknown environmental and health harms, most of which aren’t going to be immediately apparent.

“One of the challenges I will have, as I did with 9/11, is calculating with a murky crystal ball what is a future claim worth,” said Feinberg, citing health concerns that might manifest years later, or difficult-to-determine damages to the Gulf ecosystem. He offered a fishing example: If they determine fisherman will be out of work for a year and offer a $180,000 compensation, what happens when the fisherman argues that he might in fact be out of work for two years? “That individual will be offered $180,000, and if he or she doesn’t want it, don’t take it,” he says.

Other challenges lie ahead. First, there’s the question of what constitutes an eligible claim. “It’s easy if there’s a motel on the beach and no customers or no clients or guests because there’s oil there. Or you’re a fisherman who can’t fish because of the oil,” said Feinberg. “But what if you’re a motel 40 miles from beach and say business is down a third because of perception of the spill, even though the oil never got to the beach? Is that a valid claim?”

The other major problem will be documentation, especially in a region where many work in an underground economy with little or no documentation of their wages. To deal with that, he said he expects to have to take “much less documentation than would otherwise be required,” like letters certifying employment from ship captains rather than official tax forms or pay stubs.

He was also optimistic about holding BP accountable for reimbursing all injured parties with the $20 billion escrow fund. And, “if it’s insufficient,” he says, “BP has promised to honor any additional final obligations.”

Even with BP footing the bill, Feinberg will have his work cut out for him in assessing short- and long-term damages.

“I’m trying to get the money out to these people,” said Feinberg. “I’m the fiduciary for the people in the Gulf.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate