Are Tea Partiers Trying to Hijack 9/11?

Conservatives plan to mark the 9th anniversary of the attacks with a protest in DC. And they thought they had a PR problem before.

David Handschuh/Pool/Zuma

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Ever since the terrorist attacks that left nearly 3,000 people dead, September 11th has been a day of national mourning, a time to set politics aside and focus on honoring the victims. But this year, a coalition of tea party and assorted conservative “liberty” groups have other plans. They intend to commemorate the 9th anniversary of 9/11 with a political rally on the National Mall, less than three miles from the Pentagon, where American Airlines Flight 77 crashed.

Unite in Action (UIA)—an umbrella organization for a host of other conservative groups that has ties to Glenn Beck’s 9/12 Project—is planning a four-day extravaganza of “patriot” events in DC, marking the anniversary of the massive tea party rally held in Washington last September 12th. On the agenda for the 11th is a “9/11 Memorial and Unity Rally,” which UIA describes as a “call to action rally focused on the social issues threatening our freedom.”

The organizations involved are far from a neutral bunch. UIA’s advisory board includes the Oath Keepers, a militant group that has pledged to take up arms against the government if it comes down to it. (On its site, the group is advertising the 9/11 event as a “Defend the Constitution” rally.) There’s also ResistNet, a social networking organization for self-proclaimed patriots that has been heavily involved in anti-immigration campaigns. And there are veterans’ groups with ties to the Constitution Party, whose goal is to return American jurisprudence to its “Biblical roots.” While UIA claims it’s holding a “unity” rally, the event will be preceded by signmaking parties—a staple of protest marches.

For UIA, memorializing the attacks almost seems like an afterthought. None of the proceeds of its “March on DC” events appear to be going to organizations for the families of the victims. (“All revenues raised before and during the 2010 March On DC and Liberty Expo will be used for the stated purposes of UIA,” says the group’s president, Stephani Scruggs.) And the 9/11-themed portion of the agenda merely consists of a memorial service at the Washington Monument—at 7 a.m., the morning after organizers have scheduled a host of VIP cocktail parties, benefit concerts, and a banquet, slated to run late into the night, virtually ensuring that memorial turnout will be slim.

According to the “March on DC” website, the memorial service will feature “Family members of the Fallen Victims, First Responders including; Fire Departments and Fire Rescue, Members of the NYC Police Department, Search and Rescue Personnel, etc.” But Sgt. Carlos Nieves, a spokesman for the NYPD, says the department is not sending a single official, though he acknowledges that the department wouldn’t know if retired officers were planning to participate. When Mother Jones asked Scruggs for the names of the speakers representing the 9/11 families and victims, she declined to provide any, responding in an email:

Our speakers list has not yet been announced. We are in communication with a lot of these families and to protect their privacy and respect the sacred nature of this event, we have not yet decided whether we will publically release the names of the victim’s families who are participating until the day of the event. We appreciate you respecting their privacy as well.

Contacted by Mother Jones, individuals and organizations representing many 9/11 families said they had never heard about UIA’s march or memorial.

Jay Winuk’s younger brother, Glenn, was a volunteer EMT who died when the south tower of the World Trade Center collapsed. In response to the tragedy, Winuk created MyGoodDeed to honor 9/11 victims through volunteer and charitable work. He was instrumental in persuading Congress to designate 9/11 a national day of service. Winuk, whose board includes dozens of 9/11 groups and victims’ family members, says he hasn’t heard from “March on DC” organizers.

The same goes for Debra Burlingame, sister of the pilot whose plane crashed into the Pentagon and one of the best-known faces of the 9/11 families. Along with Liz Cheney, Burlingame created Keep America Safe, a conservative organization focused on homeland security. While Burlingame’s political leanings would seem to make her an ideal invitee to UIA’s memorial, she, like Winuk, was unaware of the march.

Brian Richardson, a social worker and spokesman for the organization Families of September 11, wasn’t surprised to hear about UIA’s march, though he also said his 2,000-plus member group hadn’t been contacted about it. Certain tea party groups “have tried to take their political stance and connect it with 9/11,” he says. “That for us is a stretch.” He says Families of September 11 and the members it represents believe that any 9/11 memorial should be distinct and separate from any political event. “Our position is that in regard to commemorating the attacks, they should be nonpolitical, respectful, and honor the people who were lost. They should give families a chance to express their loss and no more than that.”

While the 9/11 families have been reluctant to criticize UIA’s march directly, some tea party activists are less circumspect. They say they’re uncomfortable with the notion of holding a controversial and politically charged event on a national day of mourning. “I wouldn’t have a march on 9/11 if someone held a gun to my head,” says Robin Stublen, a tea party activist in Florida. “That’s a day of remembrance. You don’t protest. Everyone in this country remembers where they were on that day, and no one was marching.” Tony Shreeve, a Tennessee tea party organizer, agrees. “9/11 should be a day of remembrance and prayer,” he says. “I think it’s kind of disrespectful [to hold a march that day].”

Others worry that the march will further tarnish the movement’s reputation. Robert Jeffery, a Northern Virginia tea party activist, says that after the recent flap involving Tea Party Express leader Mark Williams and the NAACP, some activists in his world fear that marching on 9/11 would “tar them as racist or anti-Semitic because of the Arabs in the area.”

Scruggs admits that some people have questioned the timing of the rally. But she insists the UIA march poses no conflict with the spirit of the day. If anything, she says, it complements it. “When we explain what we are doing and our intent—that this is not a rally against anything, but for something, they are in complete agreement,” she says. “This rally is intended to unite Americans to preserve freedom. The 50+ Unite In Action Advisory Council member organizations and the hundreds of thousands of patriots they represent agree: The greatest tribute to those who lost their lives for freedom is to unite together and commit to defend it.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate