This Post Is Banned In Bemidji

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Not this one: Some cities do cows. Some cities do bears. Bemidji did beavers. Cue controversy (Photo: Tim Murphy).Not this one: Some cities do cows. Some cities do bears. Bemidji did beavers. Cue controversy (Photo: Tim Murphy).Bemidji, Minnesota—The most controversial piece of public art in the state of Minnesota sits on the corner of 4th Street and Beltrami Ave., in downtown Bemidji. For now. When I asked for directions at the Blockbuster outside town, I was told it had been moved. When I asked again at the supermarket, I was told it was no longer there. “But it’s exactly what they say it is,” said the teenaged boy at the deli counter, stifling a laugh.

“To be honest, I don’t really understand why it’s so controversial,” say Christine Lundquist, sitting on a bench with her back to the controversy. “I guess they decided freedom of expression was no longer in the Constitution. That’s how Deb wanted to paint it, and that’s how it should be.”

“I sit out here and read a lot. I eavesdrop—and I’ve only heard one negative comment. They said, ‘That’s disgusting!'” She rolls her eyes. “I mean, obviously it’s a vagina…”

What happened was this: The big deal among city beautifiers these days is to invite local artists to paint a symbolic local animal. Bennington, Vermont had cows; DC has pandas; Fargo has bison. Bemidji, home of the NCAA Frozen Four-qualifying Bemidji State Beavers, naturally chose the bucktoothed, paddle-tailed rodent that’s indigenous to its little stretch of northwest Minnesota. It’s a nice little deal: Kids like them, they’re (usually) more interesting than your average streetlamp, and it throws a little bit of work to the artists, who are, presumbly, starving. Win-win-win.

Banned in Bemidji: The little lady who started this whole broohaha (Photo: Tim Murphy).Banned in Bemidji: “Gaea,” the little lady who started this whole broohaha (Photo: Tim Murphy).Unless, of course, a handful of local residents accuse you of peddaling smut, which is what happened when Deborah Davis unveiled her own interpretation of the Bemidji Beaver. “Gaea,” a celebration of Earth and womanhood. Or, as protesting Bemidjians put it, “pornography.”

“I work right on the block, and I walked by it for a week-and-a-half and didn’t really think anything of it, and then one day I did a double-take and it was gone,” says Christine. “Someone must have complained, because someone always complains.”

After hearing the complaints, the city manager ordered that the statue be removed, temporarily relocating Gaea to a townsperson’s front yard. Then, once they realized they’d just censored a pretty innocuous work of art that they themselves had commissioned in the first place, the city council voted unanimously to bring it back. And then the vandals struck, covering the mid-section with black paint. And now it’s back, for now, although it’s probably only a matter of time before someone decides it’s too close to Ground Zero and the cries start up again.

Davis, for her part, insists there’s nothing to see here. As she told the Star-Tribune last month, “I didn’t understand that some people saw genitalia. … I understand people see different things in art, and they need to be free to do that. … My intent was to paint a praying woman.”

Whatever the case may be, the elderly, camera-toting Floridian I met across the street from the installation, has some advice for protesters: “Put on your big boy pants and get over it.”

Unreledatedly, (except, I guess, on the subject of “big boy pants”) by far the best reason to ever go to Bemidji is to see the towering sculpture of Paul Bunyan and Babe the Blue Ox. The attention to detail is staggering:

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate