Which GOP Will Reclaim Michigan?

Flickr/<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/rickformi/4641637103/">Rick forMI</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Today, the citizens of hard-hit Michigan—13.2 percent jobless rate, recurring budget crises, educated young people fleeing the state—hit the polls for the state’s gubernatorial primaries. The race to replace largely unpopular Democratic Governor Jennifer Granholm, who’s term limited, is closest on the Republican side, with the top three GOP candidates separated by only a few percentage points in the polls. That’s the primary you’ll want to watch: With an anti-incumbent mood sweeping the country, and an anti-Granholm sentiment as well, whoever wins the GOP’s highly competitive nomination today will likely claim the governor’s seat in November.

Running neck-and-neck in the Republican primary are wealthy businessman Rick Snyder (26), Attorney General Mike Cox (24), Rep. Pete Hoekstra (23 percent support), and Oakland County sheriff Mike Bouchard (10). Like the Jeff Greenes and Linda McMahons of 2010, Snyder, 51, has drawn on his considerable wealth to spend millions on campaign ads, boosting his stature from relative unknown to frontrunner in the polls. The rest of the GOP crowd are longtime state pols, guys with name recognition who’ve been around Michigan politics for years.

They also skew to the right of Snyder, who’s avoided the culture wars and is even suspected as a closet liberal on social issues. Bouchard, for instance, has called for an Arizona-like immigration crackdown in Michigan, and strongly courted the local tea party vote. Cox and Hoekstra are both traditional Republicans, selling voters on plans to slash taxes and trim state government spending. To back Hoekstra, former presidential candidate Mitt Romney is blanketing Michigan airwaves today to sway voters. But if there’s one thing that unites all the GOP’s candidates, it’s their mastery of the art of bashing Granholm for what they consider her eight-year mismanagement of a state that’s still ailing from the decline of the automotive Big Three.

For Democratic gubernatorial candidates Virg Bernero and Andy Dillon, Granholm’s legacy is as big an obstacle as unemployment or brain drain. The polling on the Bernero-Dillon race has fluctuated wildly: In mid-July, Dillon, the Michigan house speaker, led Bernero, mayor of Lansing, the state capitol, by 9 points; a few weeks later, though, a new poll showed Bernero up by eight. It’s anyone’s guess who holds the advantage heading into today’s primary.

Not that the Democratic primary winner will matter all that much. It’s pretty much a lock that today’s GOP winner will go on to replace Granholm as governor. The question is, Will that GOPer be an old-guard, familiar face like Pete Hoekstra? Or will the rise of the self-funded, wealthy dark horse candidate carry Rick Snyder past the career politicians? Snyder has been promising fresh ideas to staunch the bleeding in Michigan’s economy, casting his opponents as the same-old GOP party line. By day’s end, we’ll see if Michigan voters buy that line or stick with who they know. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate