Carly Fiorina’s Weird, Self-Defeating Stance on Climate

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


California is indisputably the nation’s leading creator of “green jobs.” According to the state’s Employment Development Department, 500,000 people work in the state’s clean tech sector. It’s one of the few parts of the state economy that’s actually growing, thanks in large part to the way that the state’s cap-and-trade law, AB 32, is driving demand for solar panels, cleaner fuels, and more efficient homes. The law is backed by everyone from Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to the Silicon Valley Leadership Group, which includes Hewlett-Packard. All of which is to underscore the weirdness of this morning’s press release from HP’s former CEO, GOP senate candidate Carly Fiorina, trashing cap-and-trade and federal green jobs funding.

“To be clear, we’re for jobs of any kind,” Fiorina’s press release says, before going on to complain that the federal government set aside $80 billion in stimulus funding for green jobs without clearly defining what constitutes a green job. It was apparently unacceptable that the Obama administration and state officials were given discretion over the money. Fiorina then complains that her opponent, Senator Barbara Boxer, “hasn’t provided much specifics about the so-called green jobs that she’s talked so much about.”

From there, Fiorina pivots to the issue of federal cap and trade legislation, claiming that it would have been “the equivalent of a 15 percent personal income tax hike and could have cost as many as 1 million jobs per year.” Of course, both figures are completley bogus. The tax hike claim is based on the total cost of emissions permits, most of which would be recycled back through the economy. The number comes from the Competitive Enterprise Institute, which has received more than $2 million from ExxonMobil and its foundations since 1998. And the jobs figure comes from the Tax Foundation, a cog in Koch Industries’ vast climate disinformation machine. In 2008, Fiorina herself said that John McCain’s cap-and-trade plan would “both create jobs and lower the cost of energy.”

Going on the attack against cap and trade is a peculiar political strategy in California, where a recent Reuters poll found that most voters believe AB 32 will “drive investment in green technology and create jobs.” But then, Fiorina is a peculiar candidate: She has accepted more than $60,000 from out-of-state coal interests. The latest poll shows her earning 40 percent of likely votes to Boxer’s 45.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate