Complaint: Elderly Black Voters Intimidated at Home

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


A voting rights lawyer has filed a complaint with the Department of Justice that elderly black voters are being harassed and intimidated at their homes in eastern Texas. Gerry Hebert, executive director of the Campaign Legal Center, submitted a complaint on Thursday to the DOJ claiming that at least seven elderly black voters “were being harassed by two unidentified white women” who visited their homes in Bowie County to question them about their mail-in ballot applications. The women are described as middle-aged, local Republican activists who had accessed publicly available information about which voters had requested mail-in ballots.

The complaint claims that the women showed up unannounced this week at the home of 78-year-old Willard Wherry, of Dekalb, who had voted by mail. The pair proceeded to grill Wherry about who had helped him to fill out his mail-in ballot, repeatedly questioning whether anyone had showed up at his home to assist him. “We are just trying to be sure no one is trying to coax someone to vote,” one of the woman said, according to Hebert’s complaint.

The women then went to a local senior citizens center to question whether five residents had received improper assistance in voting, as well as the home of L.E. Bohannon, a 79-year-old African American voter from DeKalb, the complaint says: “Then they pulled out a copy of form with his signature on it and they asked if that was his signature. They asked him who helped him fill out the form.” Molly Beth Malcolm, a local Democratic consultant, spoke directly with some of the alleged victims and claims the incidents are racially discriminatory. “They’re not going around to older Anglos, but the African-American community,” she says.

Hebert maintains that the unsolicited home visits constitute voter intimidation intended “to create a chilling effect on most of these disabled and or elderly who received assistance in voting by mail.” His complaint continues that “a group of Republicans are checking on ballots by mail and working with group out of Austin to be sure there is no voter fraud,” citing a conversation with Bowie County Elections Administrator George Steagall. Hebert also brings up reports of other harassment, including an incident in which Natalie Nichols, a GOP candidate for Bowie County Clerk, had recently threatened a Bowie County elections official over mail-in ballot fraud.

According to a signed statement by the official, Lacey Golden, Nichols came to the election office on Oct. 15 and asked whether she had verified the signatures on the envelopes of mail-in ballots. When Golden told her it was not her responsibility to do so, Nichols grew incensed, according to her statement:

She told me I was committing fraud by letting that happen, and she had called the [Secretary of State] about it already… I said that we follow the laws and that is the rules we follow. I went to get a file folder for her public info and she followed me and got real close to me and grabbed my arm and told me I better call the SOS to protect myself in a hushed voice… I feel she personally threatened me and severely invaded my personal space.

Nichols, who is running against incumbent Velma Moore, a black Democrat, did not respond to repeated request for comment.* The complaint alleges that Kathy Hicks—a local Republican activist that Hebert had previously accused harassing Texarkana City Council member Willy Rae—was also involved in the home visitations.

Local Republican officials deny any knowledge of or involvement in alleged voter intimidation. Ken Autrey, chair of the Bowie County Republican Party, told Mother Jones that he “was not aware of anyone going to somebody’s home” to check on voters. Autrey says that he had told Steagall, the county elections administrator, that “an unusually high amount of mail ballots had been requested.” But he denied that any GOP officials were involved in an organized effort to combat voter fraud. “We’re focusing on getting our candidates elected—we’re not undergoing any kinds of efforts going after voter fraud,” Autrey says.

It’s not the first time that complaints about both mail-in ballot fraud and political intimidation have surfaced in Bowie County. In 2004, Councilwoman  Ray and her granddaughter plead guilty to mishandling mail-in ballots for homebound senior citizens, having mailed them for voters after they were filled out. The two were fined $200 and given probation but later joined a multi-claim suit challenging the state’s interpretation of the Texas Election Code, claiming that the mere possession of another person’s ballot alone does not constitute voter fraud.

“It has been the practice for elderly people to have churchgoing neighbors or friends next door to come over and help them,” says Hebert, who represented Ray and her granddaughter in the suit. “The person would mark the ballot and say, drop this in the mail for me.” In 2008, a settlement was reached: in exchange for the plaintiffs dropping their complaints, the Texas Attorney General and Secretary of State agreed to give “less consideration” to complaints of mailing a ballot for another voter, acknowledging that such assistance to elderly or disabled voters did not suggest voter fraud without additional evidence of wrongdoing.

Nevertheless, despite scant proof of massive voter fraud in the state, Texas Republicans have not let up on their crusade to root out electoral wrongdoing—this time assisted by conservative tea party-aligned activists. In recent weeks, tensions have flared in the Houston area over alleged voter intimidation and misinformation campaigns at polling stations. In the latest incident, a fake group targeting black voters distributed flyers outside a Houston-area polling station with misleading information about voting Democratic.

In the Texarkana area, Democratic consultant Malcolm acknowledges that local Republican officials have rejected such tactics, claiming that those responsible are “more of your right-wing renegade” conservatives. When asked about the alleged home visits and intimidation, Jeff Akin, coordinator of the tea party group Texarkana TEA Patriots, reponded that he believed local county officials were perpetrating election fraud in the area: “I have heard reports of voter fraud in Bowie County. I have even seen the documents myself and to the untrained eye it looks as though an elected official in Bowie County could be involved in the alleged voter fraud.”*

*Akin’s remarks have been updated. Nichols later replied in an email: “Since I turned over evidence to Federal and State law enforcement agencies quite some time ago, I am not at liberty to comment on this issue at this time,” calling the accusations against her “absolutely false and libelous.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate