San Francisco’s Liberal Tea Party

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Photo: Tim MurphyPhoto: Tim MurphyThe most dedicated progressive activist of the 2010 election cycle might be a 63-year-old hippie from Dayton named “Ganja Santa.” Ganja (needless to say, a stage name), spent Saturday’s Sanity Rally in San Francisco alternatively posing for pictures in a pot-green Santa suit, and riding around Civic Center Plaza on a beer cooler that’s been retrofitted with handlebars and four wheels (a nifty contraption he calls “the cruiser cooler”).

He moved to California earlier this year solely to help rally support for Proposition 19, the California ballot provision that would legalize Marijuana. “I was in Dayton, and I just thought, ‘Man, if I’m sittin’ here and Prop 19 fails, I’ll never forgive myself,” he said. On Wednesday, win or lose, Ganja Santa will pack up his belongings and return to Ohio.

It’s the kind of commitment, if not necessarily the kind of outfit, Democratic campaigns wish they had more of in 2010. By now, you’ve probably read about yesterday’s big Comedy Central rally on the Mall (or as MoJo‘s SuzyĀ Khimm put it, “Ironypalooza”). Like any half-decent Tea Party-spinoff, though, the DC rally was only a part of the story; statellite viewing parties sprang up in dozens of cities, from the usual suspects (Seattle,Ā Chicago) to the less soĀ (RapidĀ City,Ā SouthĀ Dakota, home of the world’s most sinister Richard NixonĀ statue).

In SanĀ Francisco, the crowd of about 700 that showed up to watch the main event on the big screen left as soon as it ended, opting not to stick around in the drizzle for the scheduled stand-up comedians, mime troupe, costume contest, and lecture on the virtues of “non-violent communication.”

I’d only been at the rally for a few minutes when I was handed a card by a man walking through the crowd: “Method for a Successful Conversation about Politics.” The first step began as follows:Ā “You should not try and persuade the other person of your point of view.” The second step began, “If you are not getting anywhere assume that either you need to be clearer with your questions…” There was no third step.

It was message I heard over and over from attendees. Cheryl Schnachter drove five hours from her home in Humboldt County to show her support for civility. “We’re passionate about people being sane” she told me. “We’re really freaked out by the fear peopleā€”we’re fearful of the fear.” Still, she said, there were a few attendees didn’t “get it,” opting instead to impress their own views on others; that’s not what sanity is all about.

Kathy Causey, who stood stoically with a giant stuffed spider on her head and a veil made out of black webbingā€”because we’ve been “ensnared” by corporate cashā€”drove four hours to be here from the Sierra Nevada foothills. “I feel like there’s been a public, media lynching of Barack, and only the Tea Party is getting influence,” she said.

“I feel like having everybody here is a statement of ‘We the People.'”

That Kathy would adopt a signature phrase of today’s conservatives shouldn’t be that surprising: Stripped of Kareem, the Comedy Central crew, and the totaly random appearance of the guys from Mythbusters, the whole rally inĀ SanĀ Francisco felt like a bizarroĀ TeaĀ Party rallyā€”except no one tried to sell me anything.

Aside from a vocal army of Prop 19 activists, and a handful of others for Prop 23, the SF event was, like its mother ship, largely issue-free. Rob Gaddi, an engineer from the city, sported a big sign that read simply “IĀ have a sign.” “I was looking for something that we could all agree on,” he explained.Ā “Something that everybody could look at and say, ‘I agree.'” But even that was open to interpretation; for instance, he conceded, someone might think he was referring to an astrological signā€”and that was okay, too. He’d participated in get-out-the-vote efforts in the past, but not this year. “I have too much of the ‘rest of my life’ going on,” he explained. Plus, he added, “it’s been a difficult year to get inspired.”

Of course, loving thy neighbor and listening to your opponents can only take you so far. As I left, the non-violent communication expert was addressing the rally. Only a few dozen attendees remained, but her face loomed large over the mostly empty plaza, courtesy of a 13-foot-wide jumbotron. If you see someone at a political rally with a semi-automatic rifle and an anti-government message, she suggested, “ask yourself, ‘What need are they trying to meet?'”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate