Rutherford B. Hayes Speaks!

<a href="http://loc.gov/pictures/resource/cwpbh.03606/">Original image from Library of Congress</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Earlier this week, I introduced you to Obama’s unlikeliest 2012 challenger (well, other than the Naked Cowboy): Rutherford B. Hayes, a Navy veteran and high-school dropout who’s the chief financial officer of Miss Liberty America, the first and only Tea Party beauty pageant. Yesterday, I spoke with Hayes about his campaign.

The first thing Rutherford Bert Hayes makes clear to me is that he is absolutely not related to the disgraced and undemocratically-elected nineteenth president, Rutherford Birchard Hayes. Nor is he even named for the man known to his contemporaries as “Rutherfraud.” “It is a coincidence,” he says. “Obviously, my dad is a Hayes. But my mother was not, obviously. And her grandpa was named Rutherford. And so it was just a coincidence, because she loved her grandfather, that she named me Rutherford. And then the last name just followed. The nineteenth president, his name was Birchard. And I’m glad I didn’t get that. I had enough problems with the name Bert as a kid. You know like, ‘Hey Bert, where’s Ernie?'”

Hayes is not a Birchard; he is, however, something of a birther: “My birth certificate is Rutherford B. Hayes. That is my real name. And I do have a birth certificate.” He explains later in our conversation, “I just kind of put that in there as a jab because [Obama’s] had issues with his birth certificate. And the first thing he did when he was in office was seal his records. I mean, I don’t kow all the aspects of this stuff, but there have been things that I’ve seen that definitely question it.”

With 106 weeks to go until election day 2012, it might seem a little early to get into personal attacks, but for Hayes, a self-styled constitutionalist who’s running as an independent, the stakes are high. He’s concerned that President Obama, like Clinton and both Bushes before him, is secretly planning on joining with Mexico and Canada to form the North American Union (a fear that’s also been expressed by Kentucky senate candidate Rand Paul). Were that to happen, he explains “our Constitution just by default would be void. That would disarm America. Because we’re the only country left where the citizens are allowed to have guns.” Which is why his first move as executive would be to deploy the Marines to the US-Mexico border, then give anyone who’s in the country without proper paperwork six months to get out. He says he’ll finish the border fence and then build another one 100 yards inside the border.

So far, the campaign hasn’t been easy:
Hayes, a political novice, says he spent the first month-and-a-half just figuring out the necessary paperwork. He’s his own campaign manager, and he doesn’t have any volunteers yet (he’s also yet to report a single contribution). He’s hit the road a few times, traveling to likely battlegrounds like Ohio and Nevada to press the flesh and introduce himself to voters. There have been a few bumps along the way. “I’ve had a couple of run-ins that weren’t really run-ins,” as he puts it.
For instance, he was recently thrown out of a VA hospital for campaigning on federal property (a no-no). He also finds it difficult to speak in front of large audiences, but he thinks he’ll get over it. Friends have told him he doesn’t stand a chance unless he joins the GOP, but Hayes, a McCain supporter in 2008 (“I don’t dislike Palin,” he volunteers), wants nothing to do with either party.

At the end of the day, Hayes says his message is one of accountability, something he practices by responding to comments on Facebook, no matter how inane they are. “Even if someone’s being a turd,” he says, “I still try to respond to them.”

“I’m not saying that I’m the only hope out there. I mean, if somebody else runs that has the same values that I have, we’re still in good shape. I’m a regular American, I think you can see that from my website. I am the opposite of everyone who’s running.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate