California’s Next Lieutenant Governor: Gavin Newsom

Flickr/<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/thomashawk/2934728223/">thomashawk</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


On Tuesday night, pretty much everyone who showed up at Mayor Gavin Newsom‘s campaign party in San Francisco told me how awesome he’ll be as California’s next lieutenant governor. This struck me as a funny because rather than running a major metropolitan city, the Lt. Gov. position only focuses on two main issues: the state’s struggling higher education system (the Lt. Gov. sits on the University of California’s Board of Regents and on the CSU Board of Trustees) and the environment (the Lt. Gov. is a member of several commissions that make offshore drilling-type environmental decisions).

Newsom’s campaign party headquarters was stationed in the back room of a rustic-looking brick tequila bar called Tres Agaves, where the 125 supporters crammed inside commiserated over incoming election results, cocktails, and vats of chips and salsa. Near a flat screen TV broadcasting MSNBC’s election coverage (it was changed to a local network at some point), Lowell High School teacher Ken Tray sat with three other members of the United Educators of San Francisco (UESF), a 6,000 member public school teachers union.

“San Francisco is one of the best urban school districts in California,” says Tray, who’s also UESF’s political director. “Newsom did that by creating partnerships with school unions. He’s been very good to educators in San Francisco and to us. That’s the bottom line.”

UESF president Dennis Kelly says “Newsom saved teachers from two years of layoffs,” citing 2009 when the mayor released millions from the city’s rainy day fund to save 405 teachers jobs in the wake of massive state budget cuts to education. UESF’s four-time elected vice prez Linda Festa Plack, whose son married his husband inside the mayor’s office three times during the ongoing state squabble over marriage equality, also thinks Newsom will be fantastic as an education advocate. “Newsom appointed someone to be his education liaison and he visited public schools on a regular basis. He’s initiated a program for kindergarten students where money will be set aside for their college education.” Newsom might want college funds for every kindergartener, but he will be just one of 26 members on the UC’s board: a board headed by newly elected governor Jerry Brown, whose job Newsom ran for until pulling out of the race in 2009.

At Tres Agaves, Newsom delayed his entrance until the last election numbers came in. Wearing his usual well-tailored suit and tie, he was greeted by roaring cheers from supporters. In between hordes of photo-op requests from women (and men), I asked him about his environmental policy plans hoping to catch details not included on his website. I didn’t. “San Francisco is the greenest big city in in the US and it’s because of our work,” he said. “What you do shows what you believe. I’m not an idealogue. We’re going to have to fight to implement AB32 [the Global Warming Solutions Act, which is supposed to gradually decrease greenhouse gas emissions]. ” He went on about developing green technology and changing our bad energy consumption habits, which all sound fine. But then again, he’s going to be one member in commissions with dozens of others so his influence is going to be hard to determine.

When Newsom announced his plans to run for Lt. Gov., the rumors flew that his bid was just part of his political strategy to make it to a US Senate or even governor seat, an idea his supporters alluded to at the party. So far, Newsom’s political career has been riddled with Clinton-era type bloopers. A well-publicized affair with his campaign manager’s wife, a bout with rehab, a reputation for selling the city to private businesses in an effort push out the poor, rumors that he solely rode onto his mayoral perch using his good looks and moneyed friends, and then Tuesday the passage of his draconian proposal that makes it illegal to sit on San Francisco sidewalks—but only if you’re homeless—has generated him a place on the left’s mayoral loser list. But then none of that really has anything to do with what’s required of him as lieutenant governor. And his opponent, Abel Maldonado, blew it with his ads attacking Newsom for “sanctuary city” policies for undocumented workers, his support of 2009’s state budget education cut, and his vote against the Global Warming Solutions Act.

“The state of California will never be the same with Newsom. He’s very creative,” Linda Richardson, one of the city’s Human Rights Commissioners, assured me at the party. But I really don’t know what major difference Newsom will make in the state. That said, the prospect of him adding his one vote to projects that support education and the environment is definitely why he got my vote.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate